Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 5 1326-1330, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of floor area allowance and group size on the productivity of growing/finishing pigs

H. W. Gonyou and W. R. Stricklin
Prairie Swine Centre, Inc., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. gonyou@sask.usask.ca

Six group sizes and three levels of floor area allowance were studied in a 6 x 3 factorial arrangement. Group sizes were 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 15 pigs per pen. Floor area allowances were .030, .039, and .048 m2 x BW(.667). All pens were square and equipped with a single space feeder and nipple drinker near one corner. Pigs were fed a pelleted diet. Initial weights averaged 25.0 kg, and pigs remained on test for 12 wk. Pigs were weighed, feed intake was determined, and size of pens was increased at 2-wk intervals. Pen size was adjusted to provide the space required for the midpoint of each weigh period. Two replicates of the study were conducted. The ADG was reduced with increasing group size (899, 851, 868, 872, 857, and 821 g, SEM = 16.4, for 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 15 pigs, respectively; P < .05), but the CV for gain (mean = .185) did not differ among group sizes. The ADFI also decreased with increasing group size (2.49, 2.34, 2.32, 2.28, 2.28, and 2.21 kg, SEM = .036, for 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, and 15 pigs, respectively; P < .05). Feed efficiency (gain/intake) was highest for group sizes of 7 and 10 pigs (.381) and lowest for pens of three and five pigs (.363; P < .05). The ADG and ADFI (832 g and 2.25 kg, respectively) for the most crowded space allowance were reduced compared to more spacious allowances (ADG and ADFI of 875 and 877 g, and 2.35 and 2.36 kg, for .039 and .048 m2 x BW(.667), respectively; P < .05). Efficiency did not differ among space allowances. These results confirm previous studies reporting a negative effect of increasing group size on productivity, but our study suggests that gain and intake reach a plateau at less space allowance than previously reported.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. W. Gonyou, M. C. Brumm, E. Bush, J. Deen, S. A. Edwards, T. Fangman, J. J. McGlone, M. Meunier-Salaun, R. B. Morrison, H. Spoolder, et al. Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 229 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Kerr, K. L. Bunter, R. Seymour, B. Shen, and A. Reverter The heritability of the expression of two stress-regulated gene fragments in pigs J Anim Sci, August 1, 2005; 83(8): 1753 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Kerr, L. R. Giles, M. R. Jones, and A. Reverter Effects of grouping unfamiliar cohorts, high ambient temperature and stocking density on live performance of growing pigs J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 908 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Brumm The effect of space allocation on barrow and gilt performance J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2460 - 2466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. J. Wellock, G. C. Emmans, and I. Kyriazakis Predicting the consequences of social stressors on pig food intake and performance J Anim Sci, December 1, 2003; 81(12): 2995 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. N. Hamilton, M. Ellis, B. F. Wolter, A. P. Schinckel, and E. R. Wilson The growth performance of the progeny of two swine sire lines reared under different floor space allowances J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1126 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Schmolke, Y. Z. Li, and H. W. Gonyou Effect of group size on performance of growing-finishing pigs J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 874 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]