J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDowell, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Day, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDowell, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Day, M. L.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 5 1273-1279, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science

CLINICAL TRIAL

Development of a progestin-based estrus synchronization program: II. Reproductive response of cows fed melengestrol acetate for 14 days with injections of progesterone and prostaglandin F2alpha

C. M. McDowell, L. H. Anderson, R. P. Lemenager, D. A. Mangione and M. L. Day
Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.

We tested the efficacy of an estrus control system designed to provide optimal control of follicular development. In Exp. 1, postpartum cows (n = 133) and yearling heifers (n = 57) were fed either .5 mg x female(-1) x d(-1) of melengestrol acetate (MGA) or the carrier for MGA from d -13 to d 0 (d 0 = last day of MGA feeding). All females received 25 mg of PGF2alpha (i.m.) on d -13 and 0. On d -6, cows and heifers fed MGA were administered an i.m. injection of progesterone (200 mg; MGA/P4), and those fed the corn carrier (2XPGF2alpha) received no progesterone. Beginning on d 1, females were bred by AI from d 1 to at least d 5. During the estrus synchronization period (d 1 to d 5), more (P < .05) postpartum cows were observed in estrus (70.1 vs 42.4%), the timing of estrus was more (P < .05) precise, conception rate was similar, and pregnancy rate was higher (P < .05) in the MGA/P4 than in the 2XPGF2alpha treatment. More (P < .05) cows that were anestrous at the beginning of the breeding season were in estrus during the synchronization period in the MGA/P4 (55.8%) than in the 2XPGF2alpha (28.6%) treatment. In heifers, estrus was synchronized in over 90% of females, and neither conception nor pregnancy rate during the synchronization period differed between treatments. In Exp. 2, postpartum cows (n = 122) and heifers (n = 84) received treatments (MGA/P4 or 2XPGF2alpha) as described for Exp. 1 with one exception. In the MGA/ P4 treatment, progesterone was administered on d -7 rather than d -6. Females were bred by AI from d 1 to 5. The estrus response and conception rate during the synchronization period did not differ between treatments for either cows or heifers. We conclude that the progestin-based estrous synchronization system used in this study effectively synchronized an estrus of normal fertility in cyclic cows and induced a majority of anestrous cows to reinitiate estrous cycles.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
M. F. Martinez, J. P. Kastelic, G. P. Adams, and R. J. Mapletoft
The use of a progesterone-releasing device (CIDR-B) or melengestrol acetate with GnRH, LH, or estradiol benzoate for fixed-time AI in beef heifers
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1746 - 1751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Animal Science.