J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dehority, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dehority, B. A.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 4 1189-1196, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Generation times of Epidinium caudatum and Entodinium caudatum, determined in vitro by transferring at various time intervals

B. A. Dehority
Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691-4096, USA.

Generation times were determined in vitro with a pure culture of Epidinium caudatum and a mixed culture of Epidinium caudatum and Entodinium caudatum. Measurement of logarithmic growth from a small inoculum for Epidinium caudatum alone, or in coculture, resulted in generation times of 30.8 and 19.5 h, respectively. Epidinium concentrations, either alone or in coculture, were maintained when cultures were transferred every 12 h; however, concentrations decreased rapidly with transfers at 4, 6, or 8 h. For Entodinium caudatum, a generation time of 16.3 h was obtained from measurement of logarithmic growth. Based on sequential transfer data at varying time intervals, Epidinium caudatum and Entodinium caudatum seem to be capable of doubling in approximately 12 to 13 h. These values are markedly less than those previously reported and help explain the ability of these protozoa to maintain themselves in the rumen.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
B. A. Dehority
Improved in vitro procedure for maintaining stock cultures of three genera of rumen protozoa
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1395 - 1401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Firkins, Z. Yu, and M. Morrison
Ruminal Nitrogen Metabolism: Perspectives for Integration of Microbiology and Nutrition for Dairy
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(13_suppl): E1 - E16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. K. R. Karnati, J. T. Sylvester, S. M. Noftsger, Z. Yu, N. R. St-Pierre, and J. L. Firkins
Assessment of Ruminal Bacterial Populations and Protozoal Generation Time in Cows Fed Different Methionine Sources
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 798 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. T. Sylvester, S. K. R. Karnati, Z. Yu, C. J. Newbold, and J. L. Firkins
Evaluation of a Real-Time PCR Assay Quantifying the Ruminal Pool Size and Duodenal Flow of Protozoal Nitrogen
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 2083 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Animal Science.