J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neely, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Savell, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neely, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Savell, J. W.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 4 1027-1033, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Beef customer satisfaction: role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings

T. R. Neely, C. L. Lorenzen, R. K. Miller, J. D. Tatum, J. W. Wise, J. F. Taylor, M. J. Buyck, J. O. Reagan and J. W. Savell
Department of Animal Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2471, USA.

An in-home beef study evaluated consumer ratings from moderate-to-heavy beef users as influenced by cut (top loin, top sirloin, and top round steaks), USDA quality grade (Top Choice, Low Choice, High Select, and Low Select), and city (Chicago, Houston, Philadelphia, and San Francisco). Consumers (n = 2,212) evaluated each steak for overall like (OLIKE), tenderness (TEND), juiciness (JUIC), flavor desirability (DFLAV), and flavor intensity (IFLAV) using 23-point hedonic scales (23 = like extremely, extremely tender, extremely juicy, like extremely, and an extreme amount of flavor; 1 = dislike extremely, not at all tender, not at all juicy, dislike extremely, and no flavor at all). A USDA grade x cut interaction existed for OLIKE (P < .05). Consumers rated top loin steaks highest (P < .05) in OLIKE and ranked Top Choice highest of all steaks (P < .05). Within the top loin, consumers were not (P > .05) able to distinguish OLIKE differences between Low Choice and High Select or between High Select and Low Select. For OLIKE, top sirloin was rated intermediate (P < .05) of the three cuts, and consumers were not able to detect (P > .05) USDA quality grade differences. For OLIKE, top round was the lowest-rated (P < .05) cut. However, consumers preferred (OLIKE, P < .05) Top Choice to the other USDA grades offered. Grade and city interacted to affect TEND, JUIC, DFLAV, and IFLAV. The cut x city interaction was significant for all palatability attributes. Cut and city affected customer satisfaction more than USDA quality grade. Tenderness and flavor were important and equal contributors to OLIKE, r = .85 and r = .86, respectively.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Meisinger, J. M. James, and C. R. Calkins
Flavor relationships among muscles from the beef chuck and round
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2006; 84(10): 2826 - 2833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Behrends, K. J. Goodson, M. Koohmaraie, S. D. Shackelford, T. L. Wheeler, W. W. Morgan, J. O. Reagan, B. L. Gwartney, J. W. Wise, and J. W. Savell
Beef customer satisfaction: Factors affecting consumer evaluations of calcium chloride-injected top sirloin steaks when given instructions for preparation
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2869 - 2875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Behrends, K. J. Goodson, M. Koohmaraie, S. D. Shackelford, T. L. Wheeler, W. W. Morgan, J. O. Reagan, B. L. Gwartney, J. W. Wise, and J. W. Savell
Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 662 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. M. Killinger, C. R. Calkins, W. J. Umberger, D. M. Feuz, and K. M. Eskridge
Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3294 - 3301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. C. Kukowski, R. J. Maddock, and D. M. Wulf
Evaluating consumer acceptability of various muscles from the beef chuck and rib
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 521 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. S. Rhee, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie
Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 534 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. L. Lorenzen, R. K. Miller, J. F. Taylor, T. R. Neely, J. D. Tatum, J. W. Wise, M. J. Buyck, J. O. Reagan, and J. W. Savell
Beef Customer Satisfaction: Trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 143 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Animal Science.