Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 3 721-727, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Growth performance of pigs subjected to multiple concurrent environmental stressors

Y. Hyun, M. Ellis, G. Riskowski and R. W. Johnson
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.

The effects of many single stressors have been reported, but how pigs perform when subjected to more than one or two stressors at a time, as is common in commercial swine production, has not. To study this, 256 Yorkshire x Hampshire or purebred Duroc pigs (34.7+/-.5 kg) were subjected to one of the eight treatment combinations (2 x 2 x 2 factorial) of ambient temperature (constant thermoneutral [24 degrees C] or high cycling temperature [28 to 34 degrees C]), stocking density (.56 or .25 m2/pig), and social group (static group or regrouped at the start of wk 1 and 3) during a 4-wk experiment. The temperature regimens were imposed in two adjacent mechanically ventilated rooms, and each temperature was imposed in each room across two trials. Four barrows and four gilts were assigned to each of the eight pens in the two rooms, and they always had free access to water and a corn-soybean meal-based diet. Treatments were imposed after a 7-d acclimation period at 24 degrees C and .56 m2/pig. Weight gain and feed intake were measured weekly. The main effects of each of the stressors for 4-wk ADG and ADFI were significant (P < .05). The stress of high temperature, high stocking density, and regrouping depressed 4-wk ADG by 12, 16 and 10% and ADFI by 7, 6, and 5%, respectively. Of the possible 60 stressor interactions for ADG, ADFI, and gain:feed (G:F), there were no significant three-way interactions and only six two-way interactions, suggesting that the effects of the individual stressors were additive. Accordingly, the growth rate of pigs subjected to the single stressor of high cycling temperature, restricted space allowance, or regrouping was depressed 10, 16, and 11%, respectively, and ADG of pigs subjected to all three stressors simultaneously was depressed by 31%. Stressor additivity was further corroborated by examining the effect of stressor order, or the number of stressors imposed simultaneously. As the number of stressors increased from 0 to 3, ADG, ADFI, and G:F decreased linearly. These data suggest that multiple concurrent stressors affect growth performance of pigs in a predictable fashion (i.e., additively) and indicate that avoidance or removal of a given stressor is advantageous even when other uncontrollable stressors persist.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Sutherland, S. R. Niekamp, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, and J. L. Salak-Johnson Impacts of chronic stress and social status on various physiological and performance measures in pigs of different breeds J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 588 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Kerr, K. L. Bunter, R. Seymour, B. Shen, and A. Reverter The heritability of the expression of two stress-regulated gene fragments in pigs J Anim Sci, August 1, 2005; 83(8): 1753 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Mounier, I. Veissier, and A. Boissy Behavior, physiology, and performance of bulls mixed at the onset of finishing to form uniform body weight groups J Anim Sci, July 1, 2005; 83(7): 1696 - 1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Kerr, L. R. Giles, M. R. Jones, and A. Reverter Effects of grouping unfamiliar cohorts, high ambient temperature and stocking density on live performance of growing pigs J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 908 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. DeDecker, M. Ellis, B. F. Wolter, B. P. Corrigan, S. E. Curtis, E. N. Parr, and D. M. Webel Effects of proportion of pigs removed from a group and subsequent floor space on growth performance of finishing pigs J Anim Sci, February 1, 2005; 83(2): 449 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. E. Salfen, J. A. Carroll, D. H. Keisler, and T. A. Strauch Effects of exogenous ghrelin on feed intake, weight gain, behavior, and endocrine responses in weanling pigs J Anim Sci, July 1, 2004; 82(7): 1957 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. J. Wellock, G. C. Emmans, and I. Kyriazakis Predicting the consequences of social stressors on pig food intake and performance J Anim Sci, December 1, 2003; 81(12): 2995 - 3007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. N. Hamilton, M. Ellis, B. F. Wolter, A. P. Schinckel, and E. R. Wilson The growth performance of the progeny of two swine sire lines reared under different floor space allowances J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1126 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Frank, J. A. Carroll, G. L. Allee, and M. E. Zannelli The effects of thermal environment and spray-dried plasma on the acute-phase response of pigs challenged with lipopolysaccharide J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1166 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Wolter, M. Ellis, B. P. Corrigan, J. M. DeDecker, S. E. Curtis, E. N. Parr, and D. M. Webel Impact of early postweaning growth rate as affected by diet complexity and space allocation on subsequent growth performance of pigsin a wean-to-finish production system J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(2): 353 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. M. Bracke, B. M. Spruijt, J. H. M. Metz, and W. G. P. Schouten Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: Model structure and weighting procedure J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1819 - 1834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]