|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 10 2671-2677, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
A. Brosh, Y. Aharoni, A. A. Degen, D. Wright and B. A. Young
Department of Beef Cattle, Agricultural Research Organization, Institute of Animal Science, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, Israel. beefny@netvision.net.il
Ten growing heifers were either exposed to or protected from solar radiation, offered a diet of either high (H) or low (L) ME, and fed either in the morning or afternoon during a hot summer. Heifers that consumed the H diet had a greater water intake, DMI, metabolizable energy intake, energy expenditure, and retained energy than heifers that consumed the L diet. Solar radiation did not have an effect on any of these variables. Furthermore, dietary energy and time of measurement had an effect on rectal temperature (Tr), respiration rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and rate of oxygen uptake (VO2); solar radiation had an effect on Tr and RR but not on HR and VO2; and time of feeding had an effect only on VO2. Heifers coped with greater heat loads by increasing RR and the difference in Tr between morning and afternoon. It seems that a lowered body temperature in the morning is a physiological mechanism used by animals to prepare for the heat load that develops during the day. Heat production (HP) and HR throughout the day were affected mainly by the time of feeding and not by the environmental heat load. Feeding in the afternoon increased HP in the cooler hours of the day when heat losses from the animal through conduction and radiation were more efficient. With a pending high heat load situation, reducing feed quality and(or) changing the time of feeding to the late afternoon could be beneficial to the animals in reducing their heat loads.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Brosh Heart rate measurements as an index of energy expenditure and energy balance in ruminants: A review J Anim Sci, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1213 - 1227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. N. Keren and B. E. Olson Thermal balance of cattle grazing winter range: Model application J Anim Sci, May 1, 2006; 84(5): 1238 - 1247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Mader, M. S. Davis, and T. Brown-Brandl Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Mader and M. S. Davis Effect of management strategies on reducing heat stress of feedlot cattle: Feed and water intake J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 3077 - 3087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Davis, T. L. Mader, S. M. Holt, and A. M. Parkhurst Strategies to reduce feedlot cattle heat stress: Effects on tympanic temperature,3 J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 649 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sevi, M. Albenzio, G. Annicchiarico, M. Caroprese, R. Marino, and L. Taibi Effects of ventilation regimen on the welfare and performance of lactating ewes in summer J Anim Sci, September 1, 2002; 80(9): 2349 - 2361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Mader, S. M. Holt, G. L. Hahn, M. S. Davis, and D. E. Spiers Feeding strategies for managing heat load in feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, September 1, 2002; 80(9): 2373 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |