J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boleman, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, F. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boleman, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, F. K.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 1 96-103, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

National Beef Quality Audit-1995: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes

S. L. Boleman, S. J. Boleman, W. W. Morgan, D. S. Hale, D. B. Griffin, J. W. Savell, R. P. Ames, M. T. Smith, J. D. Tatum, T. G. Field, G. C. Smith, B. A. Gardner, J. B. Morgan, S. L. Northcutt, H. G. Dolezal, D. R. Gill and F. K. Ray
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2471, USA.

The National Beef Quality Audit-1995 was conducted to evaluate the progress of the beef industry since the time of the National Beef Quality Audit-1991 in improving quality and consistency of beef. Nine plants were assigned for auditing to Colorado State University, Oklahoma State University, and Texas A&M University. Personnel from each institution visited three of their nine plants twice, once in the spring/summer and once in the fall/winter. Data were collected on 50% of each lot on the slaughter floor and 10% in the cooler during a single day's production (one or two shifts, as appropriate). Of the cattle audited on the slaughter floor, 47.7% had no brands, 3.0% had a shoulder brand, 16.8% had a side brand, 38.7% had a butt brand, and 6.2% had brands in multiple locations. Data revealed that 51.6% of the carcasses had no bruises, 30.9% had one bruise, 12.8% had two bruises, 3.7% had three bruises, .9% had four bruises, and .1% had more than four bruises. In addition, 7.2% of the bruises evaluated were located on the round, 41.1% were on the loin, 20.8% on the rib, and 30.8% on the chuck. Livers, lungs, tripe, heads, tongues, and whole carcasses were condemned at rates of 22.2, 5.0, 11.0, .9, 3.8, and .1%, respectively. Mean USDA yield grade and quality grade traits were as follows: USDA yield grade, 2.8; carcass weight, 338.4 kg; adjusted fat thickness, 1.2 cm; longissimus muscle area, 81.9 cm2; kidney, pelvic, and heart fat, 2.1%; USDA quality grade, High Select; overall maturity, A60; and marbling score, Small-minus.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. F. M. Bonilha, L. O. Tedeschi, I. U. Packer, A. G. Razook, G. F. Alleoni, R. F. Nardon, and F. D. Resende
Evaluation of carcass characteristics of Bos indicus and tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds selected for postweaning weight
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1770 - 1780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. B. Rincker, N. A. Pyatt, L. L. Berger, and D. B. Faulkner
Relationship among GeneSTAR marbling marker, intramuscular fat deposition, and expected progeny differences in early weaned Simmental steers
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 686 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
N. A. Pyatt, L. L. Berger, D. B. Faulkner, P. M. Walker, and S. L. Rodriguez-Zas
Factors affecting carcass value and profitability in early-weaned Simmental steers: II. Days on feed endpoints and sorting strategies
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2926 - 2937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. K. Apple, E. B. Kegley, D. L. Galloway, T. J. Wistuba, and L. K. Rakes
Duration of restraint and isolation stress as a model to study the dark-cutting condition in cattle
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 1202 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. E. D. Felton and M. S. Kerley
Performance and carcass quality of steers fed different sources of dietary fat
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2004; 82(6): 1794 - 1805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Nelson, H. G. Dolezal, F. K. Ray, and J. B. Morgan
Characterization of Certified Angus Beef steaks from the round, loin, and chuck
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1437 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. S. Rhee, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie
Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 534 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. D. Shackelford, T. L. Wheeler, and M. Koohmaraie
On-line prediction of yield grade, longissimus muscle area, preliminary yield grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, and marbling score using the MARC beef carcass image analysis system
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 150 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. L. Wheeler, D. Vote, J. M. Leheska, S. D. Shackelford, K. E. Belk, D. M. Wulf, B. L. Gwartney, and M. Koohmaraie
The efficacy of three objective systems for identifying beef cuts that can be guaranteed tender
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3315 - 3327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. J. Reuter, D. M. Wulf, and R. J. Maddock
Mapping intramuscular tenderness variation in four major muscles of the beef round
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2594 - 2599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. C. Shanks, D. M. Wulf, and R. J. Maddock
Technical note: The effect of freezing on Warner-Bratzler shear force values of beef longissimus steaks across several postmortem aging periods
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2122 - 2125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Animal Science.