Journal of Animal Science, Vol 76, Issue 1 96-103, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

National Beef Quality Audit-1995: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes

S. L. Boleman, S. J. Boleman, W. W. Morgan, D. S. Hale, D. B. Griffin, J. W. Savell, R. P. Ames, M. T. Smith, J. D. Tatum, T. G. Field, G. C. Smith, B. A. Gardner, J. B. Morgan, S. L. Northcutt, H. G. Dolezal, D. R. Gill and F. K. Ray
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2471, USA.

The National Beef Quality Audit-1995 was conducted to evaluate the progress of the beef industry since the time of the National Beef Quality Audit-1991 in improving quality and consistency of beef. Nine plants were assigned for auditing to Colorado State University, Oklahoma State University, and Texas A&M University. Personnel from each institution visited three of their nine plants twice, once in the spring/summer and once in the fall/winter. Data were collected on 50% of each lot on the slaughter floor and 10% in the cooler during a single day's production (one or two shifts, as appropriate). Of the cattle audited on the slaughter floor, 47.7% had no brands, 3.0% had a shoulder brand, 16.8% had a side brand, 38.7% had a butt brand, and 6.2% had brands in multiple locations. Data revealed that 51.6% of the carcasses had no bruises, 30.9% had one bruise, 12.8% had two bruises, 3.7% had three bruises, .9% had four bruises, and .1% had more than four bruises. In addition, 7.2% of the bruises evaluated were located on the round, 41.1% were on the loin, 20.8% on the rib, and 30.8% on the chuck. Livers, lungs, tripe, heads, tongues, and whole carcasses were condemned at rates of 22.2, 5.0, 11.0, .9, 3.8, and .1%, respectively. Mean USDA yield grade and quality grade traits were as follows: USDA yield grade, 2.8; carcass weight, 338.4 kg; adjusted fat thickness, 1.2 cm; longissimus muscle area, 81.9 cm2; kidney, pelvic, and heart fat, 2.1%; USDA quality grade, High Select; overall maturity, A60; and marbling score, Small-minus.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. D. Mendez, C. O. Meza, J. M. Berruecos, P. Garces, E. J. Delgado, and M. S. Rubio A survey of beef carcass quality and quantity attributes in Mexico J Anim Sci, November 1, 2009; 87(11): 3782 - 3790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. D. Bidner, P. E. Humes, W. E. Wyatt, D. E. Franke, M. A. Persica III, G. T. Gentry, and D. C. Blouin Influence of Angus and Belgian Blue bulls mated to Hereford x Brahman cows on growth, carcass traits, and longissimus steak shear force J Anim Sci, March 1, 2009; 87(3): 1167 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Rhoades, J. E. Sawyer, A. D. Herring, and D. P. Anderson Case Study: Has Beef Quality Grade Declined? Professional Animal Scientist, December 1, 2008; 24(6): 619 - 627. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. G. Garcia, K. L. Nicholson, T. W. Hoffman, T. E. Lawrence, D. S. Hale, D. B. Griffin, J. W. Savell, D. L. VanOverbeke, J. B. Morgan, K. E. Belk, et al. National Beef Quality Audit-2005: Survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers J Anim Sci, December 1, 2008; 86(12): 3533 - 3543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. F. M. Bonilha, L. O. Tedeschi, I. U. Packer, A. G. Razook, G. F. Alleoni, R. F. Nardon, and F. D. Resende Evaluation of carcass characteristics of Bos indicus and tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds selected for postweaning weight J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1770 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Rincker, N. A. Pyatt, L. L. Berger, and D. B. Faulkner Relationship among GeneSTAR marbling marker, intramuscular fat deposition, and expected progeny differences in early weaned Simmental steers J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 686 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Pyatt, L. L. Berger, D. B. Faulkner, P. M. Walker, and S. L. Rodriguez-Zas Factors affecting carcass value and profitability in early-weaned Simmental steers: II. Days on feed endpoints and sorting strategies J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2926 - 2937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Apple, E. B. Kegley, D. L. Galloway, T. J. Wistuba, and L. K. Rakes Duration of restraint and isolation stress as a model to study the dark-cutting condition in cattle J Anim Sci, May 1, 2005; 83(5): 1202 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. E. D. Felton and M. S. Kerley Performance and carcass quality of steers fed different sources of dietary fat J Anim Sci, June 1, 2004; 82(6): 1794 - 1805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Nelson, H. G. Dolezal, F. K. Ray, and J. B. Morgan Characterization of Certified Angus Beef steaks from the round, loin, and chuck J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1437 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Rhee, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 534 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Shackelford, T. L. Wheeler, and M. Koohmaraie On-line prediction of yield grade, longissimus muscle area, preliminary yield grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, and marbling score using the MARC beef carcass image analysis system J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 150 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Wheeler, D. Vote, J. M. Leheska, S. D. Shackelford, K. E. Belk, D. M. Wulf, B. L. Gwartney, and M. Koohmaraie The efficacy of three objective systems for identifying beef cuts that can be guaranteed tender J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3315 - 3327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Reuter, D. M. Wulf, and R. J. Maddock Mapping intramuscular tenderness variation in four major muscles of the beef round J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2594 - 2599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Shanks, D. M. Wulf, and R. J. Maddock Technical note: The effect of freezing on Warner-Bratzler shear force values of beef longissimus steaks across several postmortem aging periods J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2122 - 2125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]