Journal of Animal Science, Vol 75, Issue 9 2541-2549, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evidence for a mammogenic role of growth hormone in ewes: effects of growth hormone-releasing factor during artificial induction of lactation

G. Kann
Unite de Recherches sur le Placenta et la Perinatalite, Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire et Moleculaire, I.N.R.A., Jouy en Josas, France.

Thirty-two 1-yr-old nulliparous Prealpes du Sud ewes were randomly allocated in a 2 x 2 factorial design and induced to lactate by injection of estradiol (.5 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) and progesterone (1.25 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) for 7 d (d 1 to 7). On d 18, 19, and 20, ewes received 1 mg/kg of hydrocortisone acetate twice daily to induce lactogenesis. Experimental ewes (n = 16) received human growth hormone-releasing factor 1-29 NH2 (hGRF 1-29 NH2) treatment (four daily x 100 microg hGRF i.v.) from d 10 to d 20. The other 16 ewes were controls. Half of both groups was maintained at either 8.5 h (ShD) or 15.5 h light (LD), and half of each subgroup was slaughtered on d 21. The remaining ewes were milked during a 6-wk period. Mammary gland epithelial tissue DNA concentration and liver growth hormone (GH) binding were evaluated on tissues from slaughtered ewes. The estrogen-progesterone treatment induced mammary gland development and enhanced the plasma concentrations of prolactin (PRL), GH, and IGF-I between d 1 and 7; concentrations increased 1.5, 2.3, and 2.6 times, respectively (P = .002). Between d 10 and 20, hGRF treatment enhanced (P < .001) plasma concentrations of GH (5 +/- 1.4 ng/mL on d 7 vs 14.4 +/- 1.3 ng/mL on d 20) and IGF-I (722 +/- 42 ng/mL on d 7 vs 1,281 +/- 82 ng/mL on d 18). Mammary DNA concentration at d 21 was greater (P = .07) for hGRF-treated ewes (1.2 vs .95 mg/g fresh tissue). Milk yield was greater (P < .025) in the hGRF groups (246 +/- 25 g/d vs 128 +/- 40 g/d). The long photoperiod regimen enhanced these responses. These results suggest that mammogenesis and(or) early lactogenesis in ewes is in part controlled by GH.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. R. Andrade, A. A. K. Salama, G. Caja, V. Castillo, E. Albanell, and X. Such Response to Lactation Induction Differs by Season of Year and Breed of Dairy Ewes J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2299 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. K. Salama, G. Caja, E. Albanell, S. Carne, R. Casals, and X. Such Mammogenesis and Induced Lactation With or Without Reserpine in Nulliparous Dairy Goats J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3751 - 3757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Chavatte-Palmer, Y. Heyman, C. Richard, P. Monget, D. LeBourhis, G. Kann, Y. Chilliard, X. Vignon, and J.P. Renard Clinical, Hormonal, and Hematologic Characteristics of Bovine Calves Derived from Nuclei from Somatic Cells Biol Reprod, June 1, 2002; 66(6): 1596 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.C. Lacroix, P. Bolifraud, D. Durieux, A. Pauloin, M. Vidaud, and G. Kann Placental Growth Hormone and Lactogen Production by Perifused Ovine Placental Explants: Regulation by Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone and Glucose Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 555 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Aurich, T. Gerlach, J. E. Aurich, and N. Parvizi Seasonal Variation and Opioidergic Regulation of Growth Hormone Release in Cyclic, Ovariectomized, and Pregnant Pony Mares Biol Reprod, December 1, 1999; 61(6): 1575 - 1580. [Abstract] [Full Text]