Journal of Animal Science, Vol 75, Issue 8 2024-2032, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Optimum postweaning test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency in British breed cattle

J. A. Archer, P. F. Arthur, R. M. Herd, P. F. Parnell and W. S. Pitchford
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, Australia.

The optimum duration of test for measurement of growth rate, feed intake, feed conversion, and residual feed intake was examined using postweaning feed intake and weight data from 760 Angus, Hereford, Polled Hereford, and Shorthorn heifer and Angus bull progeny from 78 sires. Variance components, heritability, phenotypic and genetic correlations, and the efficiency of selection using shortened tests compared with a 199-d test were used as criteria to assess the optimum test length. The results indicated that a 35-d test was sufficient for measurement of feed intake, whereas a 70-d test was required to measure growth rate, feed conversion, and residual feed intake without compromising the accuracy of measurement. When a 70-d test is used to measure growth rate, feed conversion, and residual feed intake there is minimal loss in accuracy when weights are collected every 2 wk instead of weekly, but a further increase in the interval between weights to 5 wk caused a decline in the accuracy of the test. Therefore a 70-d test with cattle weighed every 2 wk seems to be optimal for measuring these traits in British breed cattle.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. F. Arthur, I. M. Barchia, and L. R. Giles Optimum duration of performance tests for evaluating growing pigs for growth and feed efficiency traits J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1096 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Nkrumah, J. A. Basarab, Z. Wang, C. Li, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, D. H. Crews Jr., and S. S. Moore Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2711 - 2720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Hegarty, J. P. Goopy, R. M. Herd, and B. McCorkell Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1479 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. C. P. Castro Bulle, P. V. Paulino, A. C. Sanches, and R. D. Sainz Growth, carcass quality, and protein and energy metabolism in beef cattle with different growth potentials and residual feed intakes J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 928 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Wang, J. D. Nkrumah, C. Li, J. A. Basarab, L. A. Goonewardene, E. K. Okine, D. H. Crews Jr., and S. S. Moore Test duration for growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency in beef cattle using the GrowSafe System J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2289 - 2298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, M. J. Baker, and D. P. Kirschten Identifying differences in feed efficiency among group-fed cattle J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 767 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M Cammack, K. A. Leymaster, T. G. Jenkins, and M. K. Nielsen Estimates of genetic parameters for feed intake, feeding behavior, and daily gain in composite ram lambs J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 777 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Nkrumah, J. A. Basarab, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, A. Ammoura, S. Guercio, C. Hansen, C. Li, B. Benkel, B. Murdoch, et al. Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationships with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2451 - 2459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Herd, J. A. Archer, and P. F. Arthur Reducing the cost of beef production through genetic improvement in residual feed intake: Opportunity and challenges to application J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(13_suppl_1): E9 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]