J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lynch, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Minton, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lynch, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Minton, J. E.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 75, Issue 7 1715-1722, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of timing of gain on growth and reproductive performance of beef replacement heifers

J. M. Lynch, G. C. Lamb, B. L. Miller, R. T. Brandt Jr, R. C. Cochran and J. E. Minton
Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-0201, USA.

Our objective was to determine whether beef heifers could be developed by delaying the majority of weight gain until the last third of the developmental period before the onset of the breeding season. Spring-born Angus x Hereford heifers were used in each of two consecutive years and were allotted at weaning to gain either .45 kg/d for the entire developmental period (yr 1 = 159 d, n = 40; yr 2 = 168 d, n = 40; EVENGAIN) or to gain .11 kg/d from d 0 to 112, followed by .91 kg/d from d 112 to 159 (yr 1, n = 40) or d 168 (yr 2, n = 40; LATEGAIN). Body weights and condition scores were determined at d 0, 112, and 159 (yr 1) or d 0, 112, and 168 (yr 2). Heifers were subjected to a 60-d breeding season. Frame scores and pelvic areas were determined at the conclusion of the breeding season. Actual daily gains for EVENGAIN heifers for yr 1 and yr 2 were .60 and .51 kg/d, respectively. LATEGAIN heifers gained .25 and .05 kg/d during the restricted phases from d 0 to 112, followed by 1.14 and 1.32 kg/d during the accelerated growth phases for yr 1 and 2, respectively. Body weight at the onset of the breeding season and weight at puberty were not different between treatments in either year. Age at puberty did not differ in yr 1, but, age at puberty in yr 2 was delayed (P < .01) in LATEGAIN (406.9 d) compared to EVENGAIN (386.3 d) heifers. The LATEGAIN and EVENGAIN heifers had similar pelvic areas, frame scores, and body condition scores in each year. First-service conception rates of both groups were similar in yr 1 (55.5 vs 55.3%). In yr 2, LATEGAIN heifers tended (P = .18) to have an increase in first-service conception rate compared to EVENGAIN heifers (71.1 vs 56.4%). No treatment differences occurred in either average age of conception or overall pregnancy rates at the conclusion of the breeding season for either year. The LATEGAIN heifers were developed to a similar BW on 12 (P < .01) and 2.5% (not statistically significant) less feed for yr 1 and 2, respectively, compared to EVENGAIN heifers. We interpret these data to indicate that delaying the majority of weight gain until late in heifer development may decrease costs without detrimental effects on reproductive performance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Martin, K. W. Creighton, J. A. Musgrave, T. J. Klopfenstein, R. T. Clark, D. C. Adams, and R. N. Funston
Effect of prebreeding body weight or progestin exposure before breeding on beef heifer performance through the second breeding season
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 451 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. J. Roberts, S. I. Paisley, T. W. Geary, E. E. Grings, R. C. Waterman, and M. D. MacNeil
Effects of restricted feeding of beef heifers during the postweaning period on growth, efficiency, and ultrasound carcass characteristics
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2740 - 2745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. E. Grings, T. W. Geary, R. E. Short, and M. D. MacNeil
Beef heifer development within three calving systems
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 2048 - 2058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. C. Lamb, J. E. Larson, T. W. Geary, J. S. Stevenson, S. K. Johnson, M. L. Day, R. P. Ansotegui, D. J. Kesler, J. M. DeJarnette, and D. G. Landblom
Synchronization of estrus and artificial insemination in replacement beef heifers using gonadotropin-releasing hormone, prostaglandin F2{alpha}, and progesterone
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3000 - 3009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. L. Gasser, E. J. Behlke, D. E. Grum, and M. L. Day
Effect of timing of feeding a high-concentrate diet on growth and attainment of puberty in early-weaned heifers
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3118 - 3122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
N. H. Ciccioli, S. L. Charles-Edwards, C. Floyd, R. P. Wettemann, H. T. Purvis, K. S. Lusby, G. W. Horn, and D. L. Lalman
Incidence of puberty in beef heifers fed high- or low-starch diets for different periods before breeding
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2005; 83(11): 2653 - 2662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Animal Science.