|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 75, Issue 6 1641-1650, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
S. E. Buntinx, K. R. Pond, D. S. Fisher and J. C. Burns
Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
Forage preference is difficult to assess but is likely an important factor in determining DM intake. In two experiments, six sheep (wethers, Exp. 1; ewes, Exp. 2) were used to obtain preference ratings on nine hays (Exp. 1) or nine fresh forages (Exp. 2). The statistical procedure of multidimensional scaling was used to develop orthogonal dimensions to account for the observed variation in preference for hays and fresh forages. This analysis produced three dimensions that accounted for 54% of the variation in mean 3-d preference for hays (Exp. 1). The three dimensions were subsequently associated by regression analysis with seven compositional variables. These were IVDMD and concentrations of monosaccharides, short-chain polysaccharides (SCP), and disaccharides in dimension 1(R2 = .99); acid detergent insoluble ash (ADIA) concentration, monosaccharide and SCP concentrations, and masticate NDF in dimension 2 (R2 = .99); and disaccharide and starch concentrations in dimension 3 (R2 = .65). Three dimensions accounting for 51% of the variation in fresh forage preference were found and related to four variables by regression analysis. These were disaccharide concentration and median particle size in dimension 1 (R2 = .76) and starch and monosaccharide + disaccharide concentrations in dimension 3 (R2 = .97). No physicochemical variables analyzed in this study were found to be significantly associated with the coordinates for the forages in dimension 2. Multidimensional scaling accounted for more than half the observed variation in animal preference and, in all but one case, these dimensions could be associated with physicochemical characteristics of the forages.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. M. Thelen, J. B. Taylor, and H. F. Mayland Effect of Including Alfalfa Hays That Were Harvested in the Morning or Evening in Diets of Newly Received Sheep Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2008; 24(5): 473 - 478. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Huntington and J. C. Burns The interaction of harvesting time of day of switchgrass hay and ruminal degradability of supplemental protein offered to beef steers J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 159 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Huntington and J. C. Burns Afternoon harvest increases readily fermentable carbohydrate concentration and voluntary intake of gamagrass and switchgrass baleage by beef steers J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 276 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Fisher, J. C. Burns, and H. F. Mayland Ruminant Selection among Switchgrass Hays Cut at Either Sundown or Sunup Crop Sci., May 27, 2005; 45(4): 1394 - 1402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Burns, H. F. Mayland, and D. S. Fisher Dry matter intake and digestion of alfalfa harvested at sunset and sunrise J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 262 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Fisher, H. F. Mayland, and J. C. Burns Variation in Ruminant Preference for Alfalfa Hays Cut at Sunup and Sundown Crop Sci., January 1, 2002; 42(1): 231 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |