J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reverter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Graser, H. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reverter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Graser, H. U.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 75, Issue 6 1477-1485, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Assessing the efficiency of multiplicative mixed model equations to account for heterogeneous variance across herds in carcass scan traits from beef cattle

A. Reverter, B. Tier, D. J. Johnston and H. U. Graser
Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England, Armidale NSW, Australia.

Data (n = 2,658) from live animal ultrasonic measures from 17 Angus herds were used to evaluate a multiplicative mixed model that incorporates scaling factors to correct for across-herd heterogeneity of variance. Traits included were ribeye muscle area (EMA), surface fat at the P8 site (P8), surface fat between the 12th and 13th ribs (RIB12), and weight at scanning (WEIGHT). Cattle ranged in age from 501 to 698 d and represented 291 contemporary groups. Data were initially analyzed using single-trait, animal model, Method R procedures to estimate variance components and heritabilities (h2). These estimates were incorporated into a multiplicative mixed model that simultaneously estimates breeding values (EBV) and heterogeneity factors. Re-estimation of h2 after scaling the data with the correction factors was explored to obtain a measure of the improvement in the genetic evaluation and to detect changes in ranking of individuals and herds. Initial h2 estimates for EMA, P8, RIB12, and WEIGHT were .36, .39, .29, and .48, respectively. Scaling factors ranged from .25 for P8 in a herd with eight records to 1.96 for RIB12 in a herd with 86 individuals. Re-estimates of h2 increased by an average of 4.2% for all the traits as a result of correcting for heterogeneity. Deviations of new scaling factors were within expectations. Correlations between EBV with and without heterogeneity correction were greater than .97 for all the traits. However, some substantial re-rankings of herds were observed for some traits in the smaller herds.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Animal Science.