J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colburn, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colburn, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. C.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 75, Issue 6 1452-1460, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of sire, dam traits, calf traits, and environment on dystocia and subsequent reproduction of two-year-old heifers

D. J. Colburn, G. H. Deutscher, M. K. Nielsen and D. C. Adams
West Central Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska, North Platte 69101, USA.

A study was conducted over 3 yr to evaluate effects of sire birth weight EPD, calf birth weight and shape, and heifer pelvic area and weight, individually and in combination, on dystocia and subsequent rebreeding of 2-yr-old heifers. Heifers (n = 550), MARC II yearlings, were assigned for breeding to one of four Angus sires with birth weight EPD of -.95, -82, +2.9, and +2.7 kg. At calving, heifers were assisted as needed. A gauge attached to the cal puller recorded applied traction pressure. Analysis of traction pressure detected only slightly larger amounts of variation (2 to 3%) affecting dystocia than the standard five-point scoring system. Dam weight did not affect calving difficulty score (CDS), except dam birth weights were heavier (P < .05) for CDS 5 (Caesarean section) than CDS 1 (unassisted). Dams requiring Caesarean section had smaller pelvic areas (P < .05), with no other differences among CDS. The CDS increased as calf birth weight and cal external measurements increased. Low EPD sires produced calves with smaller (P < .05) birth weights and smaller calf head and food circumferences and caused less dystocia than high EPD sires. The CDS did not affect subsequent pregnancy rates but did affect conception date of the second calf. Calves delivered by Caesarean section were lighter (P < .05) at weaning than other calves but had similar slaughter weights. As mean winter temperature increased (6.1 degrees C) from yr 1 to 3, calf birth weight decreased (4.6 kg) and calving difficulty decreased 23%. Results indicate sire birth weight EPD, calf birth weight and shape, dam pelvic area, and climate affected CDS, and CDS affected subsequent conception date.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. L. Bennett, R. M. Thallman, W. M. Snelling, and L. A. Kuehn
Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. II. Phenotypic differences
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2103 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. N. Funston and G. H. Deutscher
Comparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 3094 - 3099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. L. Rogers, C. T. Gaskins, K. A. Johnson, and M. D. MacNeil
Evaluating longevity of composite beef females using survival analysis techniques
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 860 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Animal Science.