J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by McNitt, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by McNitt, J. I.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 75, Issue 4 926-933, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Maternal nest quality and its influence on litter survival and weaning performance in commercial rabbits

H. H. Hamilton, S. D. Lukefahr and J. I. McNitt
Alabama A&M University, Huntsville 35762, USA.

Two hundred fifty parturition records on measures of maternal nest quality were collected over four seasons (S) from does (d; n = 108) of Californian (CAL), New Zealand White (NZW), and CAL x NZW breed types (DB). Service sires (s; n = 85) were from four sire lines (SL): CAL, NZW, and control and selected synthetics. Sires were nested within SL and 6-mo breeding cycle (C). Nest quality traits included fur weight (FW), nest structure (NS) and fur placement (FP; scores 1 to 5), and kit placement (KP; scores 1 to 4). Additional doe and litter characters studied over eight parities (P) were gestation length, doe body weight at parturition, litter size and weight at birth and weaning, estimated milk yield, doe feed intake, and neonatal and preweaning survival rates (NSR and PSR). A mixed model was used that included SL, C, SL x C, s/(SL x C), DB, SL x DB, d/(SL x DB), S/C, SL x (S/C), DB x (S/C), P, SL x P, DB x P, (S/C) x P, and residual error. Neither SL, s/(SL x C), nor SL x DB influenced (P > .05) nest traits. Nest quality traits did not have normal distributions. Although residual correlations were moderate to high among nest traits studied (.21 < r < .67), correlations relating nest quality to doe and litter traits were low (r < .21). The CAL had lower (P < .05) nest trait scores than NZW purebred does. The NZW does had higher (P < .05) FW (1.9 g) and FP (.36 units) scores than CAL x NZW does. Season, but not parity, influenced (P < .05) NS and KP. From path analysis, relative to other doe and litter characters, nest traits accounted for 21.2 to 35.3% of total variation (across doe breed types) in NSR. However, nest traits had low determination (< 5%) for PSR and litter weaning weight.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
I. Barber, D. Nairn, and F. A. Huntingford
Nests as ornaments: revealing construction by male sticklebacks
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2001; 12(4): 390 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Animal Science.