Journal of Animal Science, Vol 75, Issue 12 3138-3142, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of the estrogen receptor locus on reproduction and production traits in four commercial pig lines

T. H. Short, M. F. Rothschild, O. I. Southwood, D. G. McLaren, A. de Vries, H. van der Steen, G. R. Eckardt, C. K. Tuggle, J. Helm, D. A. Vaske, A. J. Mileham and G. S. Plastow
PIC USA, Franklin, KY 42135, USA.

We investigated the effect of the estrogen receptor (ESR) gene on growth and reproductive traits in four Large White-based commercial pig lines. A total of 9,015 litter records from 4,262 sows genotyped at the ESR locus were analyzed to determine whether ESR influenced total number born (TNB) or number born alive (NBA). Teat number (TN), test ADG, ADFI, feed:gain ratio (F/G), and ultrasonic backfat (BF) were also analyzed to determine effects of ESR. The TNB and NBA were increased per favorable allele of ESR (P < .01) with additive effects of .42 (.31) and .39 (.31) pigs/litter in the first parity (later parities), respectively. Dominance effects were near zero in parity one, but they were .16 and .14 pigs for TNB and NBA, respectively, in later parities (P < .05). A favorable additive pleiotropic effect was detected for BF (P < .001; -.11 mm per copy of the favorable litter size allele). There were no detectable effects on ADG or F/G (P > .10), although ADF was reduced 18 g/d per copy of the favorable litter size allele (P < .05). Average TN was 13.1 for pigs carrying the favorable litter size allele vs 13.2 for noncarriers (P < .05). Marker-assisted selection using ESR is warranted to increase litter size in the Large White-based lines considered here and will be of considerable economic value to pork producers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Soller, S. Weigend, M. N. Romanov, J. C. M. Dekkers, and S. J. Lamont Strategies to Assess Structural Variation in the Chicken Genome and its Associations with Biodiversity and Biological Performance Poult. Sci., December 1, 2006; 85(12): 2061 - 2078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Heifetz, J. E. Fulton, N. O'Sullivan, H. Zhao, J. C. M. Dekkers, and M. Soller Extent and Consistency Across Generations of Linkage Disequilibrium in Commercial Layer Chicken Breeding Populations Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1173 - 1181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Spotter, C. Drogemuller, H. Hamann, and O. Distl Evidence of a new leukemia inhibitory factor-associated genetic marker for litter size in a synthetic pig line J Anim Sci, October 1, 2005; 83(10): 2264 - 2270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. M. van der Steen, G. F. W. Prall, and G. S. Plastow Application of genomics to the pork industry J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(13_suppl): E1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. K. Soboleva, A. B. Pleasants, B. T. T. M. van Rens, T. van der Lende, and A. J. Peterson A dynamic model for ovulation rate reveals an effect of the estrogen receptor genotype on ovarian follicular development in the pig J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2329 - 2332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. M. Dekkers Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: Strategies and lessons J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E313 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Isler, K. M. Irvin, S. M. Neal, S. J. Moeller, and M. E. Davis Examination of the relationship between the estrogen receptor gene and reproductive traits in swine J Anim Sci, September 1, 2002; 80(9): 2334 - 2339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Nilsson, S. Makela, E. Treuter, M. Tujague, J. Thomsen, G. Andersson, E. Enmark, K. Pettersson, M. Warner, and J.-A. Gustafsson Mechanisms of Estrogen Action Physiol Rev, October 1, 2001; 81(4): 1535 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]