|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 75, Issue 12 3094-3102, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
H. V. Knoblich, F. L. Fluharty and S. C. Loerch
Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center and The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691, USA.
In Trial 1, 161 Angus x Simmental crossbred steers (initial BW 305 +/- 1.0 kg) were used in a completely randomized design experiment to determine the effects of intake restriction and programmed gain on cattle performance and carcass composition and characteristics. Five feeding systems were tested using step-wise increases in programmed intake level. Initially steers were fed to gain 1.13 kg/d. Intake was then increased to achieve a gain of 1.36 kg/d. At the end of the feeding period, steers had ad libitum access to feed. Duration of intake restriction and the period of unrestricted intake was varied. Feeding steers at restricted intakes and then increasing daily gain by increasing feed intake using four different schedules all reduced (P < .05) daily feed intake and total feed intake compared with providing ad libitum access to feed throughout the trial. Furthermore, daily feed efficiency was increased (P < .05) by two of the feeding systems compared with offering ad libitum access to feed throughout the trial. The feeding system used did not affect (P > .10) quality grade of the carcasses. In Trial 2, 77 individually penned Angus x Simmental crossbred steers (initial BW 273 +/- 1.2 kg) were used to determine the effects of various feed intake restriction systems. For systems 1 through 4, multiple periods of restriction and realimentation were investigated; the duration and magnitude of restriction were varied. Feed intake was not restricted for steers in system 5. The feed restriction systems used in this experiment did not result in decreased total feed intake or changes in carcass composition as compared with offering ad libitum access to feed. Reducing total energy intake seems to be a prerequisite to altering feed efficiency of steers in limit-feeding systems.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. H. Clark, K. C. Olson, T. B. Schmidt, M. L. Linville, D. O. Alkire, D. L. Meyer, G. K. Rentfrow, C. C. Carr, and E. P. Berg Effects of dry matter intake restriction on diet digestion, energy partitioning, phosphorus retention, and ruminal fermentation by beef steers J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3383 - 3390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. McPhee, J. W. Oltjen, T. R. Famula, and R. D. Sainz Meta-analysis of factors affecting carcass characteristics of feedlot steers J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3143 - 3154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Schoonmaker, F. L. Fluharty, and S. C. Loerch Effect of source and amount of energy and rate of growth in the growing phase on adipocyte cellularity and lipogenic enzyme activity in the intramuscular and subcutaneous fat depots of Holstein steers J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 137 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Schoonmaker, M. J. Cecava, F. L. Fluharty, H. N. Zerby, and S. C. Loerch Effect of source and amount of energy and rate of growth in the growing phase on performance and carcass characteristics of early- and normal-weaned steers J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 273 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Schoonmaker, M. J. Cecava, D. B. Faulkner, F. L. Fluharty, H. N. Zerby, and S. C. Loerch Effect of source of energy and rate of growth on performance, carcass characteristics, ruminal fermentation, and serum glucose and insulin of early-weaned steers J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 843 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. T. Choat, C. R. Krehbiel, M. S. Brown, G. C. Duff, D. A. Walker, and D. R. Gill Effects of restricted versus conventional dietary adaptation on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, site and extent of digestion, digesta kinetics, and ruminal metabolism J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2726 - 2739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |