J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pettigrew, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shurson, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pettigrew, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shurson, G. C.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 9 2226-2230, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Riboflavin nutrition of sows

J. E. Pettigrew, S. M. el-Kandelgy, L. J. Johnston and G. C. Shurson
Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108, USA.

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the response of sows to high levels of dietary riboflavin. Responses evaluated were erythrocyte glutathione reductase activity coefficient (EGRAC, a biochemical indicator of riboflavin status) and reproductive performance. In Exp. 1, eight sows were fed diets either slightly deficient or superadequate in riboflavin throughout a reproductive cycle, beginning in midgestation. The EGRAC values confirmed the slight deficiency (P < .01) but did not clearly show a time when the sow is most likely to be deficient in riboflavin. In Exp. 2, 118 sows at two farms were fed diets providing 10 (control, 1.4 times the NRC [1988] requirement estimate), 60, 110, or 160 mg of riboflavin/d for 21 d beginning at breeding, and the control level through the remainder of the reproductive cycle. The percentage of sows farrowing tended to be lower (P < .10) for the control sows than for sows fed the other treatments (66.7, 85.7, 93.3, and 86.7% for 10, 60, 110, and 160 mg/d, respectively). This response is similar to other results reported previously. No other measure of reproductive performance nor EGRAC measured at any of five stages of the reproductive cycle, was affected by treatment. These results suggest that massive riboflavin supplementation of the sows' diet during early pregnancy may increase the percentage of farrowing but does no increase litter size.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.