Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 8 2010-2020, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands

F. D. Provenza
Department of Rangeland Resources, Utah State University, Logan 84322-5230, USA.

Ruminants eat an array of plant species that vary in nutrients and toxins. This selection makes intuitive sense, but no theories adequately explain this diversity. Some maintain it reduces the likelihood of overingesting toxins, whereas others contend it meets nutritional needs. Nevertheless, herbivores seek variety even when toxins are not a concern and nutritional needs are met. I offer another explanation for this behavior, one which encompasses the avoidance of toxins and the acquisition of nutrients. A key concept in this theory is aversion, the decrease in preference for food just eaten as a result of sensory input (a food's taste, odor, texture, i.e., its flavor) and postingestive effects (effects of nutrients and toxins on chemo-, osmo-, and mechano-receptors) unique to each food. Aversions are pronounced when foods contain toxins or high levels of rapidly digestible nutrients; they also occur when foods are deficient in specific nutrients. Aversions occur even when animals eat nutritionally adequate foods because satiety (satisfied to the full) and surfeit (filled to nauseating excess) represent points along a continuum, and there is a fine line between satiety and aversion. Thus, eating any food is likely to cause a mild aversion, and eating a food too frequently or in excess is likely to cause a strong aversion. Aversions are involuntary and are not the result of conscious decisions by an animal. Aversions yield benefits (e.g., obtain a balanced diet, reduce ingestion of toxic foods, optimize foraging and rumination times, sample foods, maintain a diverse microflora in the rumen) that are often mistaken as the cause of varied diets. In this article, I discuss the subtle ways in which aversions diminish preference and cause animals to eat a variety of foods.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Forbey, A. L. Harvey, M. A. Huffman, F. D. Provenza, R. Sullivan, and D. Tasdemir Exploitation of secondary metabolites by animals: A response to homeostatic challenges Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2009; 49(3): 314 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. E. Sotka, J. Forbey, M. Horn, A. G. B. Poore, D. Raubenheimer, and K. E. Whalen The emerging role of pharmacology in understanding consumer-prey interactions in marine and freshwater systems Integr. Comp. Biol., September 1, 2009; 49(3): 291 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. K. Mantz, J. J. Villalba, and F. D. Provenza Supplemental polyethylene glycol affects intake of and preference for sericea lespedeza by cattle J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 761 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Villalba, F. D. Provenza, and R. Stott Rumen distension and contraction influence feed preference by sheep J Anim Sci, January 1, 2009; 87(1): 340 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Rogosic, J. A. Pfister, F. D. Provenza, and J. Pavlicevic The effect of polyethylene glycol on intake of Mediterranean shrubs by sheep and goats J Anim Sci, December 1, 2008; 86(12): 3491 - 3496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. D. Provenza What does it mean to be locally adapted and who cares anyway? J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E271 - E284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Villalba, F. D. Provenza, and J. O. Hall Learned appetites for calcium, phosphorus, and sodium in sheep J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 738 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. D. Provenza, J. J. Villalba, J. Haskell, J. W. MacAdam, T. C. Griggs, and R. D. Wiedmeier The Value to Herbivores of Plant Physical and Chemical Diversity in Time and Space Crop Sci., February 6, 2007; 47(1): 382 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. F. Chapman, A. J. Parsons, G. P. Cosgrove, D. J. Barker, D. M. Marotti, K. J. Venning, S. M. Rutter, J. Hill, and A. N. Thompson Impacts of Spatial Patterns in Pasture on Animal Grazing Behavior, Intake, and Performance Crop Sci., February 6, 2007; 47(1): 399 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Tracy and D. B. Faulkner Pasture and Cattle Responses in Rotationally Stocked Grazing Systems Sown with Differing Levels of Species Richness Crop Sci., September 8, 2006; 46(5): 2062 - 2068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Pritchard and K. W. Bruns Controlling variation in feed intake through bunk management J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E133 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Villalba, F. D. Provenza, and R. E. Banner Influence of macronutrients and polyethylene glycol on intake of a quebracho tannin diet by sheep and goats J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3154 - 3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Duncan and S. A. Young Can goats learn about foods through conditioned food aversions and preferences when multiple food options are simultaneously available? J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2091 - 2098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Villalba, F. D. Provenza, and R. E. Banner Influence of macronutrients and activated charcoal on intake of sagebrush by sheep and goats J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2099 - 2109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]