Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 7 1470-1476, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Implant program effects on performance and carcass quality of steer calves finished for 212 days

J. A. Samber, J. D. Tatum, M. I. Wray, W. T. Nichols, J. B. Morgan and G. C. Smith
Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.

We compared the effects of seven implant treatments combining use of Ralgro (RAL), Synovex-S (SYN), and Revalor-S (REV) on performance and beef quality traits of crossbred steer calves (n = 560) finished for 212 d. A randomized complete block design was used to compare treatments consisting of 1) non-implanted control (CON); 2) RAL on d 0, SYN on d 60, and REV on d 130 (RALSYNREV); 3) RAL on d 0, REV on d 60, and REV on d 130 (RALREVREV); 4) SYN on d 30 and REV on d 130 (SYNREV); 5) REV on d 30 and REV on d 130 (REVREV); 6) REV on d 0, REV on d 75, and REV on d 150, 12.5% crude protein diet (REV3X-12.5); and 7) REV on d 0, REV on d 75, and REV on d 150, 14.5% crude protein diet (REV3X-14.5). All implant groups had higher ADG and gained more efficiently (ADG: feed intake) than the CON group. No distinct performance advantages were noted for particular implant schemes. Implant treatments did not (P > .05) affect dressing percentage, carcass weight, or KPH fat percentage. Fat thickness did not differ (P > .05) for implanted vs CON steers; however, REVREV, SYNREV, and RALREVREV steers produced fatter carcasses than did REV3X-12.5 and RALSYNREV steers. The REV3X-12.5 and REV3X-14.5 treatments increased longissimus muscle area compared with CON; longissimus muscle areas for all other treatments did not differ (P > .05) from CON. No reduction in percentage of Choice and Prime carcasses occurred with use of SYNREV or REVREV; however, all treatments receiving three successive implants had lower (P < .05) percentages of Choice and Prime carcasses than the CON group. Increasing dietary crude protein seemed to lessen the detrimental effect of three successive REV implants on percentages of Choice and Prime carcasses. Loin steaks from REVREV, REV3X-12.5, and REV3X-14.5 steers had higher (P < .05) shear force values than steaks from CON steers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. A. Griffin, D. C. Adams, and R. N. Funston The Effect of Delaying Initial Feedlot Implant on Body Weight, Average Daily Gain, and Carcass Characteristics of Calf-Fed Steers Professional Animal Scientist, April 1, 2009; 25(2): 145 - 149. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Faucitano, P. Y. Chouinard, J. Fortin, I. B. Mandell, C. Lafreniere, C. L. Girard, and R. Berthiaume Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. Meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1678 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Schneider, J. D. Tatum, T. E. Engle, and T. C. Bryant Effects of heifer finishing implants on beef carcass traits and longissimus tenderness J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 2019 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. R. Smith, S. K. Duckett, M. J. Azain, R. N. Sonon Jr., and T. D. Pringle The effect of anabolic implants on intramuscular lipid deposition in finished beef cattle J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 430 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. McPhee, J. W. Oltjen, T. R. Famula, and R. D. Sainz Meta-analysis of factors affecting carcass characteristics of feedlot steers J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3143 - 3154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Berthiaume, I. Mandell, L. Faucitano, and C. Lafreniere Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 1. Feedlot performance, carcass quality, and production costs J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2168 - 2177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Barham, J. C. Brooks, J. R. Blanton Jr., A. D. Herring, M. A. Carr, C. R. Kerth, and M. F. Miller Effects of growth implants on consumer perceptions of meat tenderness in beef steers J Anim Sci, December 1, 2003; 81(12): 3052 - 3056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Kerth, J. L. Montgomery, K. J. Morrow, M. L. Galyean, and M. F. Miller Protein turnover and sensory traits of longissimus muscle from implanted and nonimplanted heifers J Anim Sci, July 1, 2003; 81(7): 1728 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Platter, J. D. Tatum, K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga, and G. C. Smith Effects of repetitive use of hormonal implants on beef carcass quality, tenderness, and consumer ratings of beef palatability J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 984 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Reiling and D. D. Johnson Effects of implant regimens (trenbolone acetate-estradiol administered alone or in combination with zeranol) and vitamin D3 on fresh beef color and quality J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]