Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 6 1395-1405, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Ecosystems, sustainability, and animal agriculture

R. K. Heitschmidt, R. E. Short and E. E. Grings
Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Miles City, MT 59301, USA.

The long-term sustainability of animal agriculture is examined in an ecological context. As an aid to defining agriculture, animal agriculture, and sustainable agriculture, a broad overview of the structural and functional aspects of ecosystems is presented. Energy output/cultural energy input ratios were then calculated for 11 beef cattle management systems as relative measures of their long-term sustainability. Energy output was estimated by direct conversion of whole body mass of steers to caloric values. Cultural energy inputs were estimated using published forage and cereal grain production budgets in combination with estimated organic matter intakes. Cultural energy inputs included raw materials, manufacturing, distribution, maintenance, and depreciation of all equipment and products used in a 250-animal cow-calf farm/ranch operation. Management systems evaluated included 1) spring calving with slaughter beginning at either weaning (age of calf approximately 6 mo) or after 84, 168, or 252 d in postweaning finishing lot; 2) spring calving with slaughter beginning at about 18 mo of age after either 0, 42, 84, or 126 d in finishing lot; and 3) fall calving with slaughter beginning at about 14 mo of age after either 63, 126, or 189 d in finishing lot. Estimated efficiencies were < 1.0 in all treatments, even when assumed marketed calf crop was 100%. Product energy output/cultural energy input ratios ranged from a high of .40 in the spring calving--stocker--126 d in finishing lot treatment to a low of .23 in the spring calving--slaughter at weaning treatment. The low levels of efficiency were found to be largely the result of the interaction effects of the high levels of cultural energy required to maintain a productive cow herd and grow and finish calves in the rather harsh environment of the Northern Great Plains. Results pointedly reveal the high level of dependency of the U.S. beef cattle industry on fossil fuels. These findings in turn bring into question the ecological and economic risks associated with the current technology driving North American animal agriculture.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. K. Heitschmidt, L. T. Vermeire, and E. E. Grings Is rangeland agriculture sustainable? J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E138 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Pimentel and M. Pimentel Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 660S - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Reijnders and S. Soret Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 664S - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]