|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 6 1211-1216, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
S. C. Loerch
Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center 44691-4096, USA.
Three experiments were conducted to determine the efficacy of limit-feeding corn-based diets as an alternative to hay for beef cows in gestation and early lactation. Seventy or 71 mature, pregnant Simmental crossbred cows (average weight = 589 +/- 10 kg) were used in each trial. Each of 29 or 30 cows was fed approximately 5 kg of whole shelled corn, 1.2 kg of a pelletted supplement, and 1 kg of hay daily from November to April to meet nutritional needs for gestation. The remaining 41 cows were fed first-cutting round-baled hay free choice. Cows with ad libitum hay intake consumed approximately twice as much feed as cows limit-fed the corn-based diet. Body weight change during the winter was not affected (P > .10) by feeding system in Trials 1 and 2. Limit-feeding the corn-based diet had no detrimental effects on subsequent cow performance or conception rate or on calf weaning weight following summer grazing on pasture. The cost to feed a cow hay was nearly double that of limit-feeding corn-based diet. Two additional experiments were conducted to determine the effect of supplemental monensin (200 mg/d) on performance of gestating Simmental-Angus first-calf heifers fed corn-based diets. In Trial 4, monensin-supplemented heifers were fed 10% less corn than control heifers. In Trial 5, both groups were fed equal amounts of feed. No adverse effects of feeding the corn-based diets were observed. It was concluded from these trials that corn-based diets can meet the nutrient requirements of pregnant beef cattle without adverse effects on production and at a lower cost than feeding hay.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Greter, T. J. DeVries, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Nutrient Intake and Feeding Behavior of Growing Dairy Heifers: Effects of Dietary Dilution J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2786 - 2795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Hoffman, C. R. Simson, and M. Wattiaux Limit Feeding of Gravid Holstein Heifers: Effect on Growth, Manure Nutrient Excretion, and Subsequent Early Lactation Performance J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 946 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Berthiaume, I. Mandell, L. Faucitano, and C. Lafreniere Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 1. Feedlot performance, carcass quality, and production costs J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2168 - 2177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Schoonmaker, S. C. Loerch, J. E. Rossi, and M. L. Borger Stockpiled forage or limit-fed corn as alternatives to hay for gestating and lactating beef cows J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1099 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |