Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 6 1187-1193, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparative feeding value of hulless vs covered barley for feedlot cattle

R. A. Zinn, M. Montano and Y. Shen
Imperial Valley Agricultural Center, University of California, El Centro 92243, USA.

One hundred twenty medium-frame crossbred steers (364 kg) were used in a 106-d feedlot trial to compare the feeding value of Condor, a hulless barley (HB), with Leduc, a conventional covered barley (CB). Dietary treatments consisted of a finishing diet containing 77% grain (DM basis) as 1) steam-flaked corn (SFC); 2) dry-rolled HB (DRB-H); 3) steam-flaked HB (SFB-H); 4) dry-rolled CB (DRB-C); and 5) steam-flaked CB (SFB-C). Feed intake was lower (8.6%, P < .01) for HB than for CB. Diet NE was greater for HB than for CB (P < .01) and for SFB than for DRB (P < .01). Incidence of liver abscess was greater for DRB than for SFB (239%, P < .05) and for HB than for CB (167%, P < .10). Diet NE were greater (P < .10) for SFC than for barley treatments. Treatment effects on characteristics of digestion were evaluated using five Holstein steers (202 kg) with cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum. There were barley variety x grain processing interactions on ruminal digestion of OM (P < .10), ADF (P < .05), and starch (P < .05). Ruminal OM digestion increased (9.0%) with steam flaking HB and decreased slightly (1.9%) with steam flaking CB. Ruminal digestion of starch was enhanced more dramatically (21.5 vs 8.4%, respectively) with steam flaking HB than with CB. Steam flaking decreased ruminal ADF digestion of HB only slightly (6.2%), whereas with CB the decrease was more dramatic (54.3%). Ruminal degradable N was greater (P < .10) for CB than for HB and for DRB than for SFB (19.8%, P < .05). Estimates of ruminal degradable N in DRB-H, SFB-H, DRB-C, and SFB-C were 69.7, 53.9, 78.5, and 65.0%, respectively. Postruminal digestion of OM (P < .01), starch (P < .05), and N (P < .10) were greater for HB than for CB. Steam flaking barley increased (P < .01) postruminal N digestibility. Total tract digestibility of OM (P < .01), ADF (P < .05), starch (P < .01), and energy (P < .01) were greater for HB than for CB. Digestibility of ADF in barley hulls was only 6.4%. Steam flaking increased (P < .01) total tract digestibility of starch. Ruminal digestibility of OM and feed N was lower (P < .01) for SFC than for barley diets. Ruminal pH was lower (P < .10) for HB than for CB and for SFB than for DRB (P < .01). Ruminal propionate was higher (24.1%, P < .01), and methane was lower (17.9%, P < .01) for HB than for CB.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. Zinn, A. Barreras, F. N. Owens, and A. Plascencia Performance by feedlot steers and heifers: Daily gain, mature body weight, dry matter intake, and dietary energetics J Anim Sci, October 1, 2008; 86(10): 2680 - 2689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Fellner, J. C. Burns, and D. S. Marshall Effect of Feeding Corn, Hull-Less or Hulled Barley on Fermentation by Mixed Cultures of Ruminal Microorganisms J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 1936 - 1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Silveira, M. Oba, K. A. Beauchemin, and J. Helm Effect of Grains Differing in Expected Ruminal Fermentability on the Productivity of Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2852 - 2859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. I. Szasz, C. W. Hunt, O. A. Turgeon Jr., P. A. Szasz, and K. A. Johnson Effects of pasteurization of potato slurry by-product fed in corn-or barley-based beef finishing diets J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2806 - 2814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Zinn, R. Barrajas, M. Montano, and R. A. Ware Influence of dietary urea level on digestive function and growth performance of cattle fed steam-flaked barley-based finishing diets J Anim Sci, October 1, 2003; 81(10): 2383 - 2389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.G.P. Bowman, T.K. Blake, L.M.M. Surber, D.K. Habernicht, and H. Bockelman Feed-Quality Variation in the Barley Core Collection of the USDA National Small Grains Collection Crop Sci., May 1, 2001; 41(3): 863 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]