J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zinn, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zinn, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shen, Y.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 6 1187-1193, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparative feeding value of hulless vs covered barley for feedlot cattle

R. A. Zinn, M. Montano and Y. Shen
Imperial Valley Agricultural Center, University of California, El Centro 92243, USA.

One hundred twenty medium-frame crossbred steers (364 kg) were used in a 106-d feedlot trial to compare the feeding value of Condor, a hulless barley (HB), with Leduc, a conventional covered barley (CB). Dietary treatments consisted of a finishing diet containing 77% grain (DM basis) as 1) steam-flaked corn (SFC); 2) dry-rolled HB (DRB-H); 3) steam-flaked HB (SFB-H); 4) dry-rolled CB (DRB-C); and 5) steam-flaked CB (SFB-C). Feed intake was lower (8.6%, P < .01) for HB than for CB. Diet NE was greater for HB than for CB (P < .01) and for SFB than for DRB (P < .01). Incidence of liver abscess was greater for DRB than for SFB (239%, P < .05) and for HB than for CB (167%, P < .10). Diet NE were greater (P < .10) for SFC than for barley treatments. Treatment effects on characteristics of digestion were evaluated using five Holstein steers (202 kg) with cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum. There were barley variety x grain processing interactions on ruminal digestion of OM (P < .10), ADF (P < .05), and starch (P < .05). Ruminal OM digestion increased (9.0%) with steam flaking HB and decreased slightly (1.9%) with steam flaking CB. Ruminal digestion of starch was enhanced more dramatically (21.5 vs 8.4%, respectively) with steam flaking HB than with CB. Steam flaking decreased ruminal ADF digestion of HB only slightly (6.2%), whereas with CB the decrease was more dramatic (54.3%). Ruminal degradable N was greater (P < .10) for CB than for HB and for DRB than for SFB (19.8%, P < .05). Estimates of ruminal degradable N in DRB-H, SFB-H, DRB-C, and SFB-C were 69.7, 53.9, 78.5, and 65.0%, respectively. Postruminal digestion of OM (P < .01), starch (P < .05), and N (P < .10) were greater for HB than for CB. Steam flaking barley increased (P < .01) postruminal N digestibility. Total tract digestibility of OM (P < .01), ADF (P < .05), starch (P < .01), and energy (P < .01) were greater for HB than for CB. Digestibility of ADF in barley hulls was only 6.4%. Steam flaking increased (P < .01) total tract digestibility of starch. Ruminal digestibility of OM and feed N was lower (P < .01) for SFC than for barley diets. Ruminal pH was lower (P < .10) for HB than for CB and for SFB than for DRB (P < .01). Ruminal propionate was higher (24.1%, P < .01), and methane was lower (17.9%, P < .01) for HB than for CB.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
V. Fellner, J. C. Burns, and D. S. Marshall
Effect of Feeding Corn, Hull-Less or Hulled Barley on Fermentation by Mixed Cultures of Ruminal Microorganisms
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 1936 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Silveira, M. Oba, K. A. Beauchemin, and J. Helm
Effect of Grains Differing in Expected Ruminal Fermentability on the Productivity of Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2852 - 2859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. I. Szasz, C. W. Hunt, O. A. Turgeon Jr., P. A. Szasz, and K. A. Johnson
Effects of pasteurization of potato slurry by-product fed in corn-or barley-based beef finishing diets
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2806 - 2814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. A. Zinn, R. Barrajas, M. Montano, and R. A. Ware
Influence of dietary urea level on digestive function and growth performance of cattle fed steam-flaked barley-based finishing diets
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2003; 81(10): 2383 - 2389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J.G.P. Bowman, T.K. Blake, L.M.M. Surber, D.K. Habernicht, and H. Bockelman
Feed-Quality Variation in the Barley Core Collection of the USDA National Small Grains Collection
Crop Sci., May 1, 2001; 41(3): 863 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.