J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by LeFever, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by LeFever, D. G.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 4 729-735, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Detection of estrus by visual observation and radiotelemetry in peripubertal, estrus-synchronized beef heifers

J. S. Stevenson, M. W. Smith, J. R. Jaeger, L. R. Corah and D. G. LeFever
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-0201, USA.

The effectiveness of two estrus-detection methods (visual observation and radiotelemetric, pressure-sensitive, rump-mounted devices) was compared in peripubertal, crossbred yearling beef heifers. Heifers (n = 50) were fitted with a pressure-sensitive device affixed to their rumps to which a battery-operated radio transmitter was connected. Activation of the sensor sent a radiotelemetric signal to a microcomputer via a fixed radio antenna. Heifer identification, date, time, and duration of standing events were recorded. Estrus was synchronized by feeding melengestrol acetate (MGA) for 14 d and then injecting PGF2 alpha 17 d after the last daily dose of MGA. Following the injection of PGF2 alpha, heifers were observed visually for signs of estrus at 0730 and 1630 (45 min each). Estrus was detected in 41 of 49 heifers (one lost the device) by visual observation and(or) the radiotelemetric device. Number of standing events during estrus, determined by the radiotelemetric device, averaged 50.1 +/- 6.4 per heifer, with the duration of estrus ranging from 2.6 to 26.2 h (average = 14 +/- .8 h). Visual observation failed to detect 11 of 41 heifers (37%) that were detected by the radiotelemetric device. Heifers with fewer standing events (19.3 vs 60.5; P < .001) and estrus of shorter duration (8.4 vs 15.6 h; P < .001) were those not identified by visual observation. Based on intervals between the first detected standing event of estrus and time of insemination, a wide window of fertility seems to exist in some heifers. Radiotelemetric devices were useful in identifying a greater (P < .05) proportion (100%) of heifers in estrus (increased efficiency) compared with visual observation (73%). However, accuracy of both methods was similar.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Yonai, K. Kaneyama, N. Miyashita, S. Kobayashi, Y. Goto, T. Bettpu, and T. Nagai
Growth, Reproduction, and Lactation in Somatic Cell Cloned Cows with Short Telomeres
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 4097 - 4110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
F. J. White, R. P. Wettemann, M. L. Looper, T. M. Prado, and G. L. Morgan
Seasonal effects on estrous behavior and time of ovulation in nonlactating beef cows
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3053 - 3059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.