J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fondevila, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dehority, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fondevila, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dehority, B. A.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 3 678-684, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Interactions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in the digestion of cellulose from forages

M. Fondevila and B. A. Dehority
Department of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster 44691-4096, USA.

The synergistic and inhibitory interactions observed between Fibrobacter succinogenes A3c, Prevotella ruminicola H2b, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens B34b in the digestion of forage cellulose were studied in detail. Orchardgrass and alfalfa hays, both at two maturity stages, were used as substrates. Sequential inoculation procedures were developed whereby a second inoculation was made after the initial fermentation was killed. Total cellulose digestion from sequential addition of the organisms was then compared to values obtained in simultaneous co-culture. When the noncellulolytic P. ruminicola was co-cultured with either of the two cellulolytic species (F. succinogenes or R. flavefaciens) forage cellulose digestion numerically increased over that of the cellulolytic species alone. In contrast, decreases from co-culture values were noted with sequential addition of the organisms. When F. succinogenes and R. flavefaciens were co-cultured, cellulose digestion was reduced compared to F. succinogenes alone. However, no such reduction was observed when the organisms were added sequentially. Further experiments indicated that this inhibitory activity is only produced when the organisms are co-cultured and is stable to autoclaving at 121 degrees C for 20 min. Inhibition of this type could be the result of bacterocin production by one of the organisms; however, most bacterocins are destroyed by autoclaving.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Koike, J. Pan, Y. Kobayashi, and K. Tanaka
Kinetics of In Sacco Fiber-Attachment of Representative Ruminal Cellulolytic Bacteria Monitored by Competitive PCR
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2003; 86(4): 1429 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
L. R. Lynd, P. J. Weimer, W. H. van Zyl, and I. S. Pretorius
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2002; 66(3): 506 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J. L. Rychlik and J. B. Russell
Bacteriocin-Like Activity of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens JL5 and Its Effect on Other Ruminal Bacteria and Ammonia Production
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 1, 2002; 68(3): 1040 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
J. Chen and P. J. Weimer
Competition among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in the absence or presence of non-cellulolytic bacteria
Microbiology, January 1, 2001; 147(1): 21 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.