J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Clutter, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Clutter, A. C.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 3 529-534, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Estimates of heritabilities and genetic and environmental correlations for left- and right-side uterine capacity and ovulation rate in mice

M. K. Nielsen, Y. L. Kirby and A. C. Clutter
University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583-0908, USA.

Heritabilities for and genetic and environmental correlations between uterine capacity, ovulation rate, and body mass (BM) were estimated in mice. Uterine capacity was defined as the number of fetuses (LUC or RUC for left or right side) in one uterine horn for unilaterally ovariectomized females. Ovulation rate (corpora lutea, LCL or RCL for left or right ovary) was measured on the remaining single ovary in these same females. Data on 1,931 mice from four selection populations were used. Left ovulation rate and LUC were measured on 958 animals, and RCL and RUC of another 972 animals were recorded. Genetic and environmental variances and covariances were estimated simultaneously using an animal model with a multiple-trait, derivative-free, restricted maximum-likelihood procedure. Averages for heritability and correlation estimates derived from separate analyses of the selection populations are presented below. Heritability of LUC was higher (.33 +/- .06) than that of RUC (.19 +/- .02). Heritability of LCL and RCL ranged from .17 +/- .03 to .27 +/- .06, and heritability for BM was .65 +/- .05. The genetic correlation between LUC or RUC and LCL or RCL ranged between .43 +/- .29 and .68 +/- .05, and between LUC and RUC was .92 +/- .05. Body mass had a higher genetic correlation with LCL and RCL (.70 +/- .12 and .93 +/- .02) than with LUC and RUC (.37 +/- .05 and .47 +/- .12). Environmental correlations between LCL and LUC and RCL and RUC were .32 +/- .09 and .36 +/- .05, respectively.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rosendo, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel
Direct responses to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in Large White pigs
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 356 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Blasco, J. A. Ortega, A. Climent, and M. A. Santacreu
Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. I. Genetic parameters and response to selection
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2005; 83(10): 2297 - 2302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.