J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elzo, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elzo, M. A.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 2 317-328, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Unconstrained procedures for the estimation of positive definite covariance matrices using restricted maximum likelihood in multibreed populations

M. A. Elzo
Animal Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA.

Two unconstrained procedures to ensure that intrabreed and interbreed genetic and environmental covariance estimates for multibreed populations are computed within the permissible ranges were developed. These procedures were called Partial Scoring and Cholesky Maximization. The Partial Scoring procedure uses partial steps to keep estimates of covariance matrices positive definite at each expectation-maximization (EM) iteration, and the Cholesky Maximization procedure achieves the same goal by computing the elements of the Cholesky Decomposition of each intrabreed and interbreed genetic and environmental covariance matrix. Groups of small simulated data sets containing either direct genetic effects of two traits (90 bulls, 13,500 calves) or direct and maternal genetic effects for a single trait (135 bulls, 32,400 calves) were used to test the computational feasibility of these two procedures. The overall means (and ranges) of the numbers of expectation-maximization iterations, times to convergence, and accuracy of estimation were 10 (2 to 184), 26.2 min (4.1 to 773.2 min), and 40.1% (12.7 to 81.9%) for the Partial Scoring procedure and 7 (3 to 37), 16.7 min (9.5 to 64.6 min), and 37.8% (3.1 to 67.8%) for the Cholesky Maximization procedure. Although the overall accuracy of both procedures was similar, the Cholesky Maximization procedure should be preferred because it converged faster and its covariance estimates were less affected by the values of the covariance priors than those computed using the Partial Scoring strategy. Application to large unbalanced multibreed data sets will require an iterative version of these procedures.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. A. Elzo, A. Jara, and N. Barria
Genetic Parameters and Trends in the Chilean Multibreed Dairy Cattle Population
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1506 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.