J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tamminga, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tamminga, S.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 12 3112-3124, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

A review on environmental impacts of nutritional strategies in ruminants

S. Tamminga
Department of Animal Nutrition, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, WIAS, The Netherlands.

Primary (plant), secondary (animal), and tertiary (human) biological systems are driven by energy, either fossil or renewable energy in biomass. Their ratio shifts from about 10:90 in primary, via 25:75 in secondary, to 90:10 in tertiary systems. Energy input in ruminant production is mainly as plants and plant parts from primary production, and the amount needed per unit product (milk, meat) primarily depends on its digestibility. This is high in young, leafy, whole plants, in roots and tubers, and in reproductive organs (whole seeds) or organ parts (by-products) of mature plants. Use of fossil energy per kilogram of DM for primary production ranges from 1 to 3 MJ in forage to over 8 MJ in concentrate feeds, whereas input per kilogram of milk is 1 to 10 MJ. Biomass energy used in ruminant production contains nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), but in a ratio rarely balanced to the animals requirements. In secondary systems, energy is partitioned between foods of animal origin and waste. The latter contains OM, N, P, K, and gases (CO2, CH4), which may cause environmental problems. Losses per kilograms of milk vary and are 10 to 45 g for N, 0 to 3 g for P, and 2 to 20 g for K. Environmental impacts of animal production can be reduced by varying the use of inorganic fertilizer and changing the forage to concentrate ratio. Digestibilities can be improved by proper harvest management. Level and ratio of dietary N, P, and K can be adjusted to requirements by selecting proper ingredients, reducing their loss in waste. Limited scope exists to reduce losses in respiration and fermentation gases.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Calsamiglia, M. Busquet, P. W. Cardozo, L. Castillejos, and A. Ferret
Invited Review: Essential Oils as Modifiers of Rumen Microbial Fermentation
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2580 - 2595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Bach, S. Calsamiglia, and M. D. Stern
Nitrogen Metabolism in the Rumen
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2005; 88(e_suppl_1): E9 - E21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. I. Borucki Castro, L. E. Phillip, V. Girard, and A. Tremblay
Altering Dietary Cation-Anion Difference in Lactating Dairy Cows to Reduce Phosphorus Excretion to the Environment
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1751 - 1757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Davidson, B. A. Hopkins, D. E. Diaz, S. M. Bolt, C. Brownie, V. Fellner, and L. W. Whitlow
Effects of Amounts and Degradability of Dietary Protein on Lactation, Nitrogen Utilization, and Excretion in Early Lactation Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2003; 86(5): 1681 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.