J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ketelaars, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tolkamp, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ketelaars, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tolkamp, B. J.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 12 3036-3051, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Oxygen efficiency and the control of energy flow in animals and humans

J. J. Ketelaars and B. J. Tolkamp
Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility (AB-DLO), Wageningen, The Netherlands.

A new theory of feed intake regulation in ruminants has been developed as an alternative to the traditional view that feed consumption is limited by the physical and physiological constraints of the animal. Historical evidence that supports the traditional view has been examined. The new theory is based on the assumption that feed consumption has both positive and negative outcomes (benefits and costs). In a non-reproducing animal, benefits include yield of net energy for maintenance and gain. Costs are represented by the total oxygen consumption of the animal. The ratio between benefits and costs is calculated as the oxygen efficiency of feeding behavior, i.e., yield of net energy per liter of oxygen consumed. Voluntary energy intake corresponds to the feed consumption level at which oxygen efficiency is maximum. Literature examples were used to illustrate the predictive power of this theory. Differences in intake can be related to the efficiency of energy utilization, i.e., the animals' cost of processing feed. Current knowledge of the nature and causes of variation in processing costs is summarized. Secretory and absorptive processes associated with fiber consumption may explain why fiber can alter feed intake. Maximizing oxygen efficiency seems to be a unifying principle controlling other types of behavior such as locomotory behavior in humans. Possible physiological mechanisms controlling self-selected rates of locomotion are discussed in relation to the control of energy flow in ruminants.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Brosh
Heart rate measurements as an index of energy expenditure and energy balance in ruminants: A review
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1213 - 1227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. J. Tolkamp, G. C. Emmans, and I. Kyriazakis
Body fatness affects feed intake of sheep at a given body weight
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2006; 84(7): 1778 - 1789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. S. Fisher
A Review of a Few Key Factors Regulating Voluntary Feed Intake in Ruminants
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1651 - 1655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
B. A. Nolet
Efficiency as a foraging currency in animals attaining a gain below the energetic ceiling
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2002; 13(4): 571 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.