|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 12 3029-3035, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
J. M. Forbes
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, U.K.
Numerous factors have the potential to affect the amount of forage or pasture eaten by ruminant animals, including gut capacity, ability of tissues to metabolize nutrients, ruminal acidity, and osmolality. Much research into the control of food intake has tested one particular theory, often by applying greater degrees of stimulation than occur naturally, and is then unable to explain how physiological changes in that stimulus can be responsible for controlling intake. We have found that the effects of two or three stimuli (sodium acetate, sodium propionate, ruminal distension) applied together were additive. As to the site of this integration, receptors in the rumen wall are sensitive to both mechanical stimulation and acids, with transmission of impulses in vagal afferent fibers probably modulated by the osmolality of ruminal fluid. Thus, a certain degree of integration ("polymodal") is likely to have occurred at the level of the transceiving organ. A second level of integration is "polytopic." In this level stimulation of one visceral site modifies the effects of the same type of stimulus at another site. A third level of integration occurs in the central nervous system, whereby the effects of visceral stimulation might be balanced with signals from other stimuli (e.g., the special senses) to determine whether feeding should take place at any given moment. The thesis presented is that the central nervous system receives a nonspecific signal from the viscera; the animal might then learn to eat that amount of food that minimizes the competing discomforts of excessive abdominal visceral stimulation and shortage or imbalance of nutrients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. Abrahamse, J. Dijkstra, B. Vlaeminck, and S. Tamminga Frequent Allocation of Rotationally Grazed Dairy Cows Changes Grazing Behavior and Improves Productivity J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 2033 - 2045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. MacDonald, T. J. Klopfenstein, G. E. Erickson, and W. A. Griffin Effects of dried distillers grains and equivalent undegradable intake protein or ether extract on performance and forage intake of heifers grazing smooth bromegrass pastures J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2614 - 2624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Tas, H. Z. Taweel, H. J. Smit, A. Elgersma, J. Dijkstra, and S. Tamminga Effects of Perennial Ryegrass Cultivars on Intake, Digestibility, and Milk Yield in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3240 - 3248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Bradford and M. S. Allen Phlorizin Administration Increases Hepatic Gluconeogenic Enzyme mRNA Abundance but Not Feed Intake in Late-Lactation Dairy Cows J. Nutr., September 1, 2005; 135(9): 2206 - 2211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Bowman, K. A. Beauchemin, and J. A. Shelford Fibrolytic Enzymes and Parity Effects on Feeding Behavior, Salivation, and Ruminal pH of Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2003; 86(2): 565 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Forbes The multifactorial nature of food intake control J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E139 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hayirli, R. R. Grummer, E. V. Nordheim, and P. M. Crump Animal and Dietary Factors Affecting Feed Intake During the Prefresh Transition Period in Holsteins J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2002; 85(12): 3430 - 3443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Fisher A Review of a Few Key Factors Regulating Voluntary Feed Intake in Ruminants Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1651 - 1655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |