J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aaron, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aaron, D. K.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 11 2810-2827, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Writing across the curriculum: putting theory into practice in animal science courses

D. K. Aaron
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0215, USA.

Founded on the premise that "learning to write" and "writing to learn" are parallel processes, Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) programs advocate the use of writing activities to enhance learning in subject matter courses across the university curriculum. Application of WAC theory to creating assignments and evaluating writing in undergraduate animal science courses is the primary focus of this paper. Although a variety of writing-to-learn activities are promoted by WAC programs, this discussion is confined to reader-based, applied or real-world assignments completed by students outside the classroom. Writing assignments of this type are effective learning tools because they guide students toward appropriate information, language, and organization, present writing as communication, not artifact, and allow students to see how classroom study of concepts can be applied to the real world. Additionally, they provide opportunity for feedback during the writing process. Although considerable effort is required to create such writing assignments and to design evaluation and grading strategies that will provide constructive feedback, animal science teachers have a responsibility to provide students with expanded opportunities for improving critical thinking and communication skills. Sharing writing assignments, like the ones included in this paper, is one way to accomplish these objectives while minimizing aggregate faculty effort.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
D. S. Buchanan
ASAS Centennial Paper: Animal science teaching: A century of excellence
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2008; 86(12): 3640 - 3646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
C. J. Ackerman, D. W. Weber, and R. L. Dickson
Oregon State University's Steer-a-Year program: Integrating classroom learning and hands-on experience
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2764 - 2769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.