| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 11 2730-2737, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
M. C. Brumm and P. S. Miller
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Northeast Research & Extension Center, Concord 68728, USA.
Three experiments were conducted to determine the main and interacting effects on growth performance of floor space allowance and dietary lysine and energy concentrations for growing-finishing pigs. In each experiment, space allocations of .56 or .78 m2/pig were achieved with 14 or 10 pigs per pen, respectively. In Exp. 1, diets investigated were National Research Council (NRC) recommended nutrient densities, NRC plus 5% added fat (F), NRC plus .15% added L-lysine. HCl (L), and NRC plus fat plus lysine (FL) in a 4 x 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of diets with space and season (winter vs summer). In Exp. 2 and 3, a 2 x 3 factorial treatment arrangement was used to investigate space and diet effects. Diets investigated contained 0, 2.5, or 5% added fat (choice white grease [Exp. 2]; tallow [Exp. 3]) with L-lysine.HCl added to maintain a constant lysine:ME ratio. In Exp.1, pigs given .56 m2/pig vs .78 m2/pig ate less feed (P < .001) and grew slower (P < .001) with no difference in gain:feed ratio or carcass lean percentage. Feed intake was decreased (P < .005) and gain:feed ratio increased (P < .001) for the FL vs L diet. In Exp. 2, pigs given .56 m2/pig vs .78 m2/pig grew slower (P < .001) with a poorer gain:feed ratio (P < .05) and a slower rate of lean gain (P < .05). In Exp. 3, pigs given .56 m2/pig vs .78 m2/pig grew slower (P < .05) with no difference in gain:feed ratio and a slower rate of lean gain (P < .005). There was a linear improvement in ADG (P < .01, Exp. 2; P = .011, Exp. 3) and gain:feed ratio (P < .001, Exp. 2 and 3) with increasing amounts of fat in the diet. The lack of space x diet interactions in these experiments suggests that the reduction in ADG associated with the reduction in ADFI for pigs given less space is independent of dietary lysine and energy concentrations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. R. Street and H. W. Gonyou Effects of housing finishing pigs in two group sizes and at two floor space allocations on production, health, behavior, and physiological variables J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 982 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. W. Gonyou, M. C. Brumm, E. Bush, J. Deen, S. A. Edwards, T. Fangman, J. J. McGlone, M. Meunier-Salaun, R. B. Morrison, H. Spoolder, et al. Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 229 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Brumm, P. S. Miller, and R. C. Thaler Response of barrows to space allocation and ractopamine J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3373 - 3379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Brumm The effect of space allocation on barrow and gilt performance J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2460 - 2466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. N. Hamilton, M. Ellis, B. F. Wolter, A. P. Schinckel, and E. R. Wilson The growth performance of the progeny of two swine sire lines reared under different floor space allowances J Anim Sci, May 1, 2003; 81(5): 1126 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
