J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Potts, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Potts, W. J.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 11 2663-2671, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Body composition analysis of pigs by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

A. D. Mitchell, J. M. Conway and W. J. Potts
Growth Biology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated as a method for measuring body composition of pigs. Forty-eight female pigs (10.2 to 60.5 kg) were killed and the whole bodies scanned on a DXA instrument. The DXA measurements provided readings of total tissue mass, percentage of fat, fat tissue mass, lean body mass, and bone mineral content. By chemical analysis, the whole body fat content of the pigs ranged from 9.3 to 24.3%, giving rise to DXA RST values (ratio of attenuation coefficients) ranging from 1.386 to 1.334. The average percentage body fat measured by DXA (18.2 +/- .9%) was not significantly different (P = .76) from the results by chemical analysis (17.8 +/- .6%); however, concordance correlation analysis revealed unacceptable accuracy in the DXA measurement due to a negative bias for smaller percentages and a positive bias for larger percentages. Total body fat measured by the two methods was also highly correlated (r = .989), and the average for DXA (7.31 +/- .62 kg) was not significantly different (P = .89) from the value for the chemical method (7.20 +/- .50 kg). The relationship between the DXA estimate of lean body mass and the amount of protein in the body by chemical analysis was described by the equation: kg protein = .227.kg DXA lean -1.28, with a correlation coefficient (r) of .968. The DXA measurements of total tissue mass and actual body weights were highly correlated (r = .999), with an acceptable concordance at the .05 level. Scans were also analyzed for regional composition of the front and back legs. It was generally difficult to determine anatomically how well soft tissue described by DXA regions corresponded to those dissected. The DXA and chemical results for regional analysis of back legs were in better agreement than those for the front legs. These results indicate that DXA may be used as a reliable method for measuring body composition of pigs, but needs more extensive calibration and may be more appropriate for total body rather than regional analysis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of the American Animal Hospital AssociationHome page
D. I. Mawby, J. W. Bartges, A. d'Avignon, D. P. Laflamme, T. D. Moyers, and T. Cottrell
Comparison of Various Methods for Estimating Body Fat in Dogs
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., March 1, 2004; 40(2): 109 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. D Sainz and A. Urlando
Evaluation of a new pediatric air-displacement plethysmograph for body-composition assessment by means of chemical analysis of bovine tissue phantoms
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2003; 77(2): 364 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.