J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bunge, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lupton, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bunge, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lupton, C. J.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 1 25-30, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Performance of hair breeds and prolific wool breeds of sheep in southern Illinois: wool production and fleece quality

R. Bunge, D. L. Thomas, T. G. Nash and C. J. Lupton
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.

The objective of this study was to compare weight and quality of fleeces of different F1 ewe types produced from breeds with a broad range of fleece types. Weights of 629 fleeces produced during 1988 through 1991 from F1 ewes that were daughters of Suffolk and Targhee dams and Finnsheep, Combo-6, Booroola Merino, St. Croix, and Barbados sires were recorded. Staple length was measured on the mid-side of each ewe present in 1991. Fleeces shorn in 1991 were sent to a wool marketing organization, and staple length, wool grade, and clean fleece yield were subjectively estimated (n = 220). Mid-side fleece samples were collected from no more than two randomly selected ewes from each subclass (breed of dam-breed of sire-age of ewe) in 1991 (n = 78) and sent to a wool laboratory where fiber diameter, yield, and percentage of colored, med, and kemp fibers were objectively determined. Ewes from Targhee dams produced fleeces with greater weight, greater fiber length, smaller fiber diameter, lower yield, and fewer colored fibers than ewes from Suffolk dams (all differences significant, P < .01). Booroola Merino-sired ewes produced heavier (P < .01) fleeces than did Finnsheep- and Combo-6-sired ewes (4.13 and 3.09 kg, respectively), and in turn, Finnsheep- and Combo-6-sired ewes produced heavier (P < .01) fleeces than did ewes sired by hair breed rams (3.09 and 1.70 kg, respectively). Among hair breed-sired ewes, St. Croixsired ewes produced heavier (P < .01) fleeces than did Barbados-sired ewes (1.88 and 1.52 kg, respectively). Fleeces produced by Booroola Merino-sired ewes had smaller (P < .01) fiber diameter than all sire breed groups except Combo-6-sired ewes, and fleeces produced by St. Croix-sired ewes had greater (P < .01) fiber diameter than all other sire breed groups. Lab scoured yield was greater (P < .01) for fleeces from ewes from hair breed than for fleeces from ewes from wool breed sires (74.2 vs 66.1%). Proportions of undesirable fibers (med, kemp, and colored) were 20 to 600 times greater (P < .01) in fleeces of ewes from hair breed sires than in fleeces of ewes from wool breed sires. In general, F1 ewes from Booroola Merino sires produced the heaviest, highest quality fleeces, and ewes from the hair breed sires of St. Croix and Barbados produced the lightest, lowest quality fleeces. Ewes from Finnsheep and Combo-6 sires produced fleeces that were more similar to the fleeces of ewes from Booroola Merino sires than to the fleeces of ewes from the hair breed sires.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Puchala, S. G. Pierzynowski, T. Wuliji, A. L. Goetsch, S. A. Soto-Navarro, and T. Sahlu
Effects of prolactin administered to a perfused area of the skin of Angora goats
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Animal Science.