Journal of Animal Science, Vol 74, Issue 1 18-24, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of barley variety and processing methods on feedlot steer performance and carcass characteristics

W. L. Bradshaw, D. D. Hinman, R. C. Bull, D. O. Everson and S. J. Sorensen
Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow 83844-2330, USA.

An experiment was conducted to evaluate ammoniation and temper processing of two barley varieties of diverse types on feedlot cattle performance and diet digestibility. Steptoe (feed variety) and Klages (malting variety) barleys were processed as dry-rolled (DR); tempered and rolled (TR); tempered, ammoniated, and rolled (AR); and tempered, ammoniated, and fed whole (AW). Crossbred steers (n = 240, initial weight 266 kg) were blocked by weight and randomly assigned to one of eight treatments in a 2 x 4 factorial arrangement. Diets contained 30% barley (DM basis) for the growing phase and 85% (DM basis) for the finishing phase. Growing phase ADG and gain to feed (G/F) were less (P < .05) for AW than for DR, TR, and AR. Average daily gain was less (P < .05) for AW than for TR and AR in the finishing phase. There were no differences (P > .05) in ADG or G/F between DR, TR, and AR during growing or finishing phases. Gain to feed was greater (P < .05) for TR and AR than for AW but not for DR for the total trial. Hot carcass weight, longissimus muscle area, and kidney-pelvic-heart fat were greater (P < .05) for TR and AR than for AW. Total finishing diet ADF digestibility was greater (P < .05) for Steptoe than for Klages (40.5 vs 31.4%, respectively). The DR treatment had the lowest ADF digestibility, whereas AR had the greatest (P < .05). Results suggest that there were no differences in feedlot steer performance due to barley varieties of the same bulk density and that barley grain must be mechanically processed for optimal performance response rather than ammoniated and fed as whole grain.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. J. Scholljegerdes, B. W. Hess, M. H. J. Grant, S. L. Lake, B. M. Alexander, T. R. Weston, D. L. Hixon, E. A. Van Kirk, and G. E. Moss Effects of feeding high-linoleate safflower seeds on postpartum reproduction in beef cows J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 2985 - 2995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Flores, M. L. Looper, R. W. Rorie, D. M. Hallford, and C. F. Rosenkrans Jr Endocrine factors and ovarian follicles are influenced by body condition and somatotropin in postpartum beef cows J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1335 - 1344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Zinn, E. G. Alverez, M. Montano, and J. Salinas-Chavira Influence of dry-rolling and tempering agent addition during the steam-flaking of sorghum grain on its feeding value for feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 916 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Silveira, M. Oba, K. A. Beauchemin, and J. Helm Effect of Grains Differing in Expected Ruminal Fermentability on the Productivity of Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2852 - 2859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Krehbiel, J. J. Cranston, and M. P. McCurdy An upper limit for caloric density of finishing diets J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(13_suppl): E34 - E. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. L. Bengochea, G. P. Lardy, M. L. Bauer, and S. A. Soto-Navarro Effect of grain processing degree on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation, and performance characteristics of steers fed medium-concentrate growing diets J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2815 - 2825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. W. Hess, S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, T. R. Weston, V. Nayigihugu, J. D. C. Molle, and G. E. Moss Nutritional controls of beef cow reproduction J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(13_suppl): E90 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wang, D. Greer, and T. A. McAllister Effects of moisture, roller setting, and saponin-based surfactant on barley processing, ruminal degradation of barley, and growth performance by feedlot steers J Anim Sci, September 1, 2003; 81(9): 2145 - 2154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Bossis, R.P. Wettemann, S.D. Welty, J. Vizcarra, and L.J. Spicer Nutritionally Induced Anovulation in Beef Heifers: Ovarian and Endocrine Function During Realimentation and Resumption of Ovulation Biol Reprod, May 1, 2000; 62(5): 1436 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text]