Journal of Animal Science, Vol 73, Issue 8 2249-2253, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Individual differences in docility in Limousin cattle

P. Le Neindre, G. Trillat, J. Sapa, F. Menissier, J. N. Bonnet and J. M. Chupin
Laboratoire Adaptation des Herbivores aux Milieux, INRA Theix, Saint-Genes-Champanelle, France.

Docility tests were performed over 3 yr on 906 Limousin heifers sired by 34 males. The heifers were tested individually when they were 10 to 11 mo old in a pen with a handler who had 2 min to lead the animal to a corner, keep it there for 30 consecutive seconds, and then to stroke it. Behaviours of the animals were recorded and scores calculated. The first score (docility score) was a continuous variable combining the greatest possible information. The second score (docility criterion) was a categorical trait with four classes. Tests were performed by seven different handlers. The effects of handler, year, birth period, dam parity, birth region, husbandry system, and sire were estimated. Handlers, birth period, husbandry system, and sire had significant effects. In particular, animals that were managed indoors were more docile than those reared out-of-doors at least part of the time. Heritability estimates of the docility score (.22) and docility criterion (.18) seem sufficient to select for docility traits.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Core, T. Widowski, G. Mason, and S. Miller Eye white percentage as a predictor of temperament in beef cattle J Anim Sci, June 1, 2009; 87(6): 2168 - 2174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Merrill, R. P. Ansotegui, P. D. Burns, M. D. MacNeil, and T. W. Geary Effects of flunixin meglumine and transportation on establishment of pregnancy in beef cows J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1547 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ishiwata, R. J. Kilgour, K. Uetake, Y. Eguchi, and T. Tanaka Choice of attractive conditions by beef cattle in a Y-maze just after release from restraint J Anim Sci, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 1080 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Beckman, R. M. Enns, S. E. Speidel, B. W. Brigham, and D. J. Garrick Maternal effects on docility in Limousin cattle J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 650 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Konig, F. Kohn, K. Kuwan, H. Simianer, and M. Gauly Use of repeated measures analysis for evaluation of genetic background of dairy cattle behavior in automatic milking systems. J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3636 - 3644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. A. Beauchemin, D. J. Gibb, D. H. Crews Jr., D. D. Hickman, M. Streeter, and T. A. McAllister Effect of bunk management on feeding behavior, ruminal acidosis and performance of feedlot cattle: A review J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E149 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Schmutz, J. M. Stookey, D. C. Winkelman-Sim, C. S. Waltz, Y. Plante, and F. C. Buchanan A QTL Study of Cattle Behavioral Traits in Embryo Transfer Families J. Hered., May 1, 2001; 92(3): 290 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]