J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woltmann, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woltmann, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, D. S.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 73, Issue 7 1940-1947, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of divergent selection for postweaning average daily gain on front-end soundness of market-weight pigs

M. D. Woltmann, A. C. Clutter and D. S. Buchanan
Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078, USA.

A total of 975 barrows and gilts from lines divergently selected for postweaning ADG were evaluated for front-end structural soundness (scored on a scale from 1, extreme leg weakness, to 8, superior leg structure) at approximately 100 kg, as well as growth performance and backfat thickness. Selection was for either fast (line F) or slow (line S) ADG from 9 wk of age to 100 kg and was replicated in spring- and fall-farrowing groups. The cumulative divergent selection differential corresponding to the animals evaluated was .47 kg/d (approximately 5 standard deviations). There was a line x sex x farrowing group interaction (P < .05) for ADG. Pigs from F grew faster (P < .01) than pigs from S, but the difference between lines was greater in gilts than in barrows. This interaction between line and sex was more pronounced in the spring- than in the fall-farrowing group. Average daily feed intake was 23% greater (P < .01) for F pigs than for S pigs. Even though pigs from F consumed more feed than those from S, their relatively faster ADG resulted in a greater (P < .01) feed efficiency (gain/feed) in F than in S. There was a line x farrowing group interaction (P < .05) for average backfat thickness adjusted to 105 kg. Barrows and gilts from F had 3.9 and 8.3% greater backfat thickness than those from S in the fall- and spring-farrowing groups, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Animal Science.