| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 73, Issue 4 993-1001, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
W. M. Snelling, B. L. Golden and R. M. Bourdon
Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.
Nonlinear mixed-model procedures for analysis of binary data were used to estimate heritability (h2), predict individual genetic merit, and determine genetic and environmental trends for four measures of stayability of beef females. Traits considered were probabilities of a female having 2 [S(2/1)], 5 [S(5/1)], 8 [S(8/1)] and 11 [S(11/1)] calves, given that she calved once. Colorado State University Beef Improvement Center (BIC) and Beckton Stock Farm (BSF) provided data for the analyses. Heritability was estimated using animal model marginal maximum likelihood (AM MML), sire model marginal maximum likelihood (SM MML), and animal model Method R (AM MR). Individual genetic merit was predicted using single-trait animal models with each h2 estimate. Birth year was treated as fixed in all analyses. Only AM MML yielded h2 estimates for all traits in both herds. The AM MML h2 estimates for S(2/1), S(5/1), S(8/1), and S(11/1) were .09, .11, .07, and .20, respectively, for BSF data and .02, .14, .09, and .07, respectively, for BIC data. Differing h2 estimates did not substantially influence rank of individual predictions. Genetic trends in stayability were positive in both herds, although birth year solutions indicated variable or negative environmental trends. Genetic improvement of stayability may be accelerated by incorporating predictions of genetic merit for stayability in selection criteria. S(5/1) may be the most useful trait for consideration in national cattle evaluations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. H. Van Melis, J. P. Eler, H. N. Oliveira, G. J. M. Rosa, J. A. V. Silva II, J. B. S. Ferraz, and E. Pereira Study of stayability in Nellore cows using a threshold model J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1780 - 1786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. MacNeil, T. W. Geary, G. A. Perry, A. J. Roberts, and L. J. Alexander Genetic partitioning of variation in ovulatory follicle size and probability of pregnancy in beef cattle J Anim Sci, July 1, 2006; 84(7): 1646 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Roughsedge, P. R. Amer, R. Thompson, and G. Simm Genetic parameters for a maternal breeding goal in beef production J Anim Sci, October 1, 2005; 83(10): 2319 - 2329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. E. Martinez, R. M. Koch, L. V. Cundiff, K. E. Gregory, S. D. Kachman, and L. D. Van Vleck Genetic parameters for stayability, stayability at calving, and stayability at weaning to specified ages for Hereford cows J Anim Sci, September 1, 2005; 83(9): 2033 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Eler, J. A. I. V. Silva, J. L. Evans, J. B. S. Ferraz, F. Dias, and B. L. Golden Additive genetic relationships between heifer pregnancy and scrotal circumference in Nellore cattle J Anim Sci, September 1, 2004; 82(9): 2519 - 2527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. L. Rogers, C. T. Gaskins, K. A. Johnson, and M. D. MacNeil Evaluating longevity of composite beef females using survival analysis techniques J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 860 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Wilton Genomic and computing strategies in the optimization of the genetic component of specification beef J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E24 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
