J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meissner, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coertze, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meissner, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coertze, R. J.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 73, Issue 4 931-936, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Characteristics and efficiency of fast-growing feedlot steers fed different dietary energy concentrations

H. H. Meissner, M. Smuts and R. J. Coertze
Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.

Most prediction equations of feedlot performance cover average daily gains (ADG) below 1.5 kg/d. The question is whether these equations would be accurate for higher ADG. Medium-to-large-framed weanling and yearling steer calves were fed individually using a transponder-electronic gate system in three feedlot trials and fed in groups in two trials. Average daily gain ranged from .9 to 2.1 kg. Steers were implanted, fed to the same degree of finish, and slaughtered to obtain dressing percentage and cold carcass weight. Initial carcass weights were estimated from initial slaughter groups. Dietary ME concentration (i.e., 10.5, 11.5, 12.0, and 12.5 MJ ME/kg of DM, where 1 Mcal = 4.184 MJ), initial weight, dry matter intake (DMI), and days fed could explain 57% of the variation in ADG. The partial contribution of DMI to the total variation was only 5.2%, confirming the low correlation between DMI and ADG in feedlot trials. The correlation between metabolizable energy intake (MEI) and MEI/ADG also was low, but 80% of the variation in MEI/ADG was accounted for by the variation in ADG. Intake patterns, regardless of dietary energy concentration, indicate that ADG increased with DMI only when ADG was below 1.5 kg/d. Therefore, current prediction equations apparently overpredict ME requirements for fast-growing feedlot steers. Optimal performance occurred at a ME concentration of 12.0 MJ/kg of DM rather than 12.5 MJ/kg of DM. Dressing percentage and carcass gain increased as dietary energy concentration and ADG increased, and current prediction equations should predict that of fast-growing feedlot steers equally well.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. D. Nkrumah, J. A. Basarab, Z. Wang, C. Li, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, D. H. Crews Jr., and S. S. Moore
Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2711 - 2720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. D. Nkrumah, J. A. Basarab, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, A. Ammoura, S. Guercio, C. Hansen, C. Li, B. Benkel, B. Murdoch, et al.
Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationships with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2451 - 2459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Animal Science.