J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, C. K.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 73, Issue 4 1055-1063, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of breed type and accelerated fat removal on subprimal yields and carcass values

M. F. Miller, C. B. Ramsey, S. W. Claborn and C. K. Wu
Animal Science and Food Technology Department, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409, USA.

Nine Brown Swiss and nine English crossbred steers representing the industry standard were slaughtered to determine the effects of cattle type and hot fat removal on subprimal yields and carcass value. After dressing, cod fat, kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPHF), and subcutaneous fat thicker than .6 cm was removed from the right side of each carcass (HFT). The left side was not hot-fat trimmed (NFT). Both sides were fabricated into subprimal cuts with no more than .6 cm of subcutaneous fat. Carcass side values were adjusted to a 300-kg chilled carcass weight basis. All comparisons were made for the carcasses using a USDA Select quality grade end point. English crossbred steer carcasses had more (P < .05) subcutaneous fat on the loin and chuck and more (P < .05) total hot fat trim, when KPHF was not included, than Brown Swiss steers (P < .05). Brown Swiss steers had more (P < .05) KPHF. Hot-fat trimmed sides had higher (P < .05) percentage yields from the chuck, brisket, foreshank, rib, plate, round primal cuts, and most of the subprimal cuts than NFT sides, but the primal loin percentage was higher (P < .05) in the NFT sides. The total subprimal cuts yield was approximately 5% higher for the HFT sides than for the NFT sides, and the total fat trim during fabrication was more than 6% less. When the value of the sides was calculated from unadjusted weights, the NFT sides were approximately $26.50 more valuable than the HFT sides.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Animal Science.