J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varel, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kreikemeier, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varel, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kreikemeier, K. K.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 73, Issue 2 578-582, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Technical note: comparison of in vitro and in situ digestibility methods

V. H. Varel and K. K. Kreikemeier
R. L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA.

Relative comparisons were made between the in vitro and in situ methods for determining NDF digestion kinetics. In a split-split-plot design, eight cows and six heifers (whole plot) with ruminal cannulas were fed either alfalfa hay (20% CP) or bromegrass hay (8% CP; subplot) to determine differences between the methods (sub-subplot). Cattle were fed the diets for 28 d; d 1 to 20 were used for adaptation, and on d 21 to 28 the in situ experiment was conducted. On d 24 ruminal fluid samples were obtained for in vitro estimation of forage NDF digestion kinetics. In vitro incubation vessels contained a 1:4 (vol:vol) dilution of ruminal inoculum to buffer and .5 g of NDF substrate. Dacron bags containing .5 g of NDF substrate from alfalfa or bromegrass were incubated ruminally for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, and 192 h to determine lag time, rate, and extent of digestion. In vitro samples were incubated for the same times and computations. Results from the four treatments (cows and heifers fed alfalfa and bromegrass) indicate that on average the lag time was 3.5 +/- .3 h less (P < .01), rate was .03 +/- .002/h faster (P < .01), and extent was 6.0 +/- .5% greater (P < .01) for the in situ than for the in vitro method for determining NDF digestion kinetics. These results should be useful when one is interested in making relative comparisons in the digestibility of forages among studies that used the in situ or in vitro method.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. Bossen, D. R. Mertens, and M. R. Weisbjerg
Influence of Fermentation Methods on Neutral Detergent Fiber Degradation Parameters
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1464 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
E. J. Scholljegerdes, P. A. Ludden, and B. W. Hess
Effect of restricted forage intake on ruminal disappearance of bromegrass hay and a blood meal, feather meal, and fish meal supplement
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2005; 83(9): 2146 - 2150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. M. Krause and D. K. Combs
Effects of Forage Particle Size, Forage Source, and Grain Fermentability on Performance and Ruminal pH in Midlactation Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2003; 86(4): 1382 - 1397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. Enjalbert, P. Eynard, M. C. Nicot, A. Troegeler-Meynadier, C. Bayourthe, and R. Moncoulon
In Vitro Versus in Situ Ruminal Biohydrogenation of Unsaturated Fatty Acids from a Raw or Extruded Mixture of Ground Canola Seed/Canola Meal
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2003; 86(1): 351 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Animal Science.