J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huber, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holcombe, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huber, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holcombe, D. W.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 73, Issue 12 3752-3765, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cattle grazing a riparian mountain meadow: effects of low and moderate stocking density on nutrition, behavior, diet selection, and plant growth response

S. A. Huber, M. B. Judkins, L. J. Krysl, T. J. Svejcar, B. W. Hess and D. W. Holcombe
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno 89557-0104, USA.

Twelve ruminally cannulated and six intact crossbred beef steers were used in a randomized complete block design to evaluate the effects of stocking density of a riparian pasture in the Sierra Nevada mountains on grazing behavior, dietary selection, forage intake, digesta kinetics, and growth rates of Carex nebraskensis and Juncus balticus. Nine .5-ha pastures were assigned to one of three treatments: ungrazed (CON) or grazed to leave either 1,500 kg/ha (LOW) or 1,000 kg/ha (MOD). Two collections were conducted during the summer of 1992 (following winter drought) and 1993 (following above-average winter precipitation). Standing crop biomass was greater (P < .05) in grazed pastures than in CON pastures at initiation of grazing in 1992 but not in 1993. After grazing in both 1992 and 1993, a treatment x intrapasture location interaction was noted (P < .05). Tiller growth rates in both 1992 and 1993 were affected (P < .05) by a treatment x growth period interaction. Stocking density did not alter (P > .10) botanical or chemical composition of the diet in 1992, and only minor differences were noted (P < .05) in 1993. Forage intake, passage rate measures, and total time spent loafing did not differ (P > .10) between LOW and MOD steers. Within the mid-meadow area in 1992, loafing time was greater (P< .05) for MOD steers than for LOW steers. In 1993, a treatment x trial interaction was noted for loafing time in all three areas. Total time spent grazing was greater (P < .05) for MOD steers than for LOW steers in 1992 and was affected (P < .05) by a treatment x trial interaction in 1993. In 1992 grazing time along the streamside was greater (P < .05) for LOW steers than for MOD steers, and significant treatment x trial interactions were noted for grazing time spent along the forest edge and mid-meadow areas. In 1993, only streamside grazing time was influenced by treatment being greater (P < .05) for MOD steers than for LOW steers. In general, our data suggest that management decisions to reduce stocking densities may force cattle to congregate along streambanks and to concentrate grazing and loafing activities in those areas.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Animal Science.