J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saboulard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saboulard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Riley, M. L.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 73, Issue 11 3195-3198, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Selection for lambing rate and clean fleece weight in sheep

M. Saboulard, W. C. Russell and M. L. Riley
Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071, USA.

This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of selection for lambing rate (LB) and clean fleece weight (CFW) separately or by a combination of both traits at once. Two flocks of approximately 200 western white faced ewes per flock were maintained at two locations. Each flock was divided into four equal selection groups of similar initial birth type and age. The basis of selection in each flock was as follows: Line I, single trait selection for LB; Line II, single trait selection for CFW; Line III, multiple trait selection for LB and CFW; and Line IV; visual selection based on conformation and general fleece quality. Repeatability and heritability estimates were .18 and .16 +/- .04, respectively, for LB and .66 and .60 +/- .09, respectively, for CFW. The genetic correlation between LB and CFW was .26 +/- .16. Linear regression coefficients (number born/year) of annual response for LB in Lines I to IV were .018 +/- .008, .009 +/- .006, .011 +/- .005, and .009 +/- .005 (P > .05). Linear regression coefficients (kg/year) of annual observed response for CFW in lines I to IV were -.001 +/- .006, .027 +/- .009, .019 +/- .006, and .008 +/- .006. Response in Lines II and III was significant for CFW (P < .05) compared with Lines I and IV. In this study, CFW was increased by selection in white-faced sheep with little effect on lambing rate.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. C. Borg, D. R. Notter, and R. W. Kott
Genetic analysis of ewe stayability and its association with lamb growth and adult production
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2009; 87(11): 3515 - 3524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. J. Hanford, L. D. Van Vleck, and G. D. Snowder
Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Targhee sheep
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 630 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. J. Hanford, L. D. Van Vleck, and G. D. Snowder
Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Columbia sheep
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3086 - 3098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Animal Science.