J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pate, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pate, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, A. C.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 73, Issue 10 2865-2872, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Value of feather meal in a molasses-based liquid supplement fed to yearling cattle consuming a forage diet

F. M. Pate, W. F. Brown and A. C. Hammond
Range Cattle Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Ona 33865, USA.

Hydrolyzed feather meal (FM) was compared to other sources of CP to determine its value as a protein source in a molasses-based liquid supplement. Ruminal N escape values (measured in situ) for FM, ring-dried blood meal, cottonseed meal, and soybean meal approximated reported values. Ruminal N escape value for catfish meal was lower than values reported for other fish meals. In two trials (194 d), 84 yearling heifers were allotted to 12 pastures (3 pastures/treatment) and fed one of four supplements (1.7 kg of DM.heifer-1.d-1) containing either molasses and urea; molasses, urea,and FM; molasses, urea, FM, and catfish meal; or molasses, urea, FM, and catfish oil. Heifers were exposed to bulls for 60 d. In two trials, 112 steers were allotted to 16 pastures (4 Pastures/treatment) and fed one of four supplements (1.7 kg of DM.steer-1.d-1) containing molasses and urea; molasses, urea and FM; molasses, urea, FM and ring-dried poultry blood meal; or molasses, urea, and poultry feathers and blood hydrolyzed together. In all trials, cattle fed molasses containing FM had faster gains (P < .05) and heifers had heavier live weights at breeding (P < .05) and higher pregnancy rates (P < .05) than cattle fed molasses and urea. Combining poultry blood with molasses, urea, and FM improved (P < .05) steer gains in one of two trials. Combining catfish meal with molasses, urea, and FM did not improve (P > .05) ADG of pregnancy rate of heifers. Combining catfish oil with molasses, urea, and FM increased (P < .05) ADG in one trial and blood cholesterol and live weight of heifers at breeding in both trials. It is concluded that protein feeds, such as FM, that contain a large portion of ruminally undegradable protein may provide much of the CP in liquid supplements fed to growing cattle consuming moderate-quality forage. Adding catfish oil to a liquid supplement may improve ADG and live weight of yearling heifers at breeding.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
R. F. Cooke and J. D. Arthington
Case Study: Effects of Protein Source Added to Molasses-based Supplements on Performance of Range Cows
Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2008; 24(3): 264 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Animal Science.