Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 9 2247-2253, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Method R variance components procedure: application on the simple breeding value model

A. Reverter, B. L. Golden, R. M. Bourdon and J. S. Brinks
Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523.

An algorithm for estimating variance components (Method R) based on the linear regression coefficient (R) of recent (more accurate) on previous (less accurate) individual genetic predictions is presented. The previous prediction is obtained by analyzing a subsample of the whole data set. First raw moment of R equals 1 regardless of the distribution of observations and predictions. A condition such as the use of inappropriate variance components ratio (VC) can cause this regression to deviate from its expectation. If the computed R (Rc) is greater than 1, then VC ratio has been underestimated, and if Rc is less than 1, then VC ratio has been overestimated. Several iterations are performed, changing the VC ratio at each iteration, until Rc approximately equal to 1. When an Rc is obtained that is acceptably close to 1 (precision is reached), then the appropriate VC has been used. Method R does not require computation of the inverse of the coefficient matrix and has desirable properties of convergence, precision, and computing feasibility. Additional sampling variance in the estimate of VC is expected due to the requirement of taking a subsample of the entire data set to obtain the lower accuracy predictions. This sampling variance is shown to be small for simulated datasets of size n = 10,000 with no selection.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Gengler, G. R. Wiggans, L. L. M. Thornton, J. R. Wright, and T. Druet Accounting for heterogeneous variances in multitrait evaluation of Jersey type traits. J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 3143 - 3151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Eler, J. A. I. V. Silva, J. L. Evans, J. B. S. Ferraz, F. Dias, and B. L. Golden Additive genetic relationships between heifer pregnancy and scrotal circumference in Nellore cattle J Anim Sci, September 1, 2004; 82(9): 2519 - 2527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Gengler, G. R. Wiggans, and A. Gillon Estimated Heterogeneity of Phenotypic Variance of Test-Day Yield with a Structural Variance Model J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1908 - 1916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Moser, A. Reverter, C. A. Kerr, K. J. Beh, and S. A. Lehnert A mixed-model approach for the analysis of cDNA microarray gene expression data from extreme-performing pigs after infection with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1261 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Bormann, G. R. Wiggans, T. Druet, and N. Gengler Within-Herd Effects of Age at Test Day and Lactation Stage on Test-Day Yields J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3765 - 3774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. H. Choy, J. S. Brinks, and R. M. Bourdon Repeated-measure animal models to estimate genetic components of mature weight, hip height, and body condition score J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2071 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]