J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Louis, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stroup, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Louis, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stroup, W. W.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 8 2051-2060, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effect of energy and protein intakes on boar libido, semen characteristics, and plasma hormone concentrations

G. F. Louis, A. J. Lewis, W. C. Weldon, P. M. Ermer, P. S. Miller, R. J. Kittok and W. W. Stroup
Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908.

To determine the effect of energy and protein intakes on boar libido, semen characteristics, and plasma hormone concentrations, 24 crossbred boars (1 yr of age) were allotted to one of three dietary treatments. Two protein levels (7.7 and 18.1 g/d of lysine) and two energy levels (6.1 and 7.7 Mcal/d of ME) were combined to create 1) low-energy and low-protein (ep), 2) low-energy and high-protein (eP), and 3) high-energy and high-protein (EP) treatments. Semen was collected two times per week for 27 wk. During wk 28, blood samples were collected before and after a intravenous injection of GnRH (375 ng/kg of BW). The EP boars had higher (P < .01) ADG than the eP boars (373 vs 169 g), which had higher (P < .01) ADG than the ep boars (169 vs 92 g). Fewer EP and eP boars (zero of eight and two of eight, respectively) than ep boars (five of eight) consistently refused to mount the collection dummy (P < .05). During the final 20 wk of the semen-collection period, EP and eP boars had 33% longer durations of ejaculation (P < .04), had 60% greater semen and gelatinous fraction volumes (P < .03), but had 25% lower sperm concentration in their semen (P < or = .12) than ep boars. The EP boars produced 38% more sperm than the ep boars (P < .10). Baseline LH concentration, LH pulse frequency, LH pulse amplitude, testosterone concentration, and estradiol-17 beta concentrations were not affected by treatment (P > .10).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Animal Science.