J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pate, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pate, J. L.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 7 1884-1890, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cellular components involved in luteolysis

J. L. Pate
Department of Dairy Science, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

In the domestic species, regression of the corpus luteum is dependent on uterine release of prostaglandin (PG)F2 alpha. Despite the central role of PGF2 alpha in luteolysis, very little is known about the actual mechanism of prostaglandin-induced regression at the level of the luteal cell. Many studies have focused on the cellular site of action of PGF2 alpha, and it seems likely that this compound exerts multiple effects on luteal cells. Large luteal cells probably respond initially to the luteolytic signal, but intercellular communication between large and small cells, as well as between luteal and non-luteal cells, is probably required for regression to proceed. The immune system seems to be actively involved in the process of luteolysis, and it is possible that luteal cells actively signal certain types of immune cells. It is now known that luteal cells respond to a variety of immune cell secretory products, and this knowledge may lead to the discovery of additional mechanisms involved in regression of the corpus luteum.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. L. Bogan, M. J. Murphy, R. L. Stouffer, and J. D. Hennebold
Systematic Determination of Differential Gene Expression in the Primate Corpus Luteum during the Luteal Phase of the Menstrual Cycle
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1260 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. C. Peluffo, R. L. Stouffer, and M. Tesone
Activity and expression of different members of the caspase family in the rat corpus luteum during pregnancy and postpartum
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1215 - E1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. J. Skarzynski, J. J. Jaroszewski, M. M. Bah, K. M. Deptula, B. Barszczewska, B. Gawronska, and W. Hansel
Administration of a Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitor Counteracts Prostaglandin F2-Induced Luteolysis in Cattle
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1674 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. K. Pru, I. R. Hendry, J. S. Davis, and B. R. Rueda
Soluble Fas Ligand Activates the Sphingomyelin Pathway and Induces Apoptosis in Luteal Steroidogenic Cells Independently of Stress-Activated p38MAPK
Endocrinology, November 1, 2002; 143(11): 4350 - 4357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
H.A. Pan, S.J. Tsai, C.W. Chen, Y.C. Lee, Y.M. Lin, and P.L. Kuo
Expression of DAZL protein in the human corpus luteum
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 8(6): 540 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. A. Towle, P. C.W. Tsang, R. A. Milvae, M. K. Newbury, and J. A. McCracken
Dynamic In Vivo Changes in Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases 1 and 2, and Matrix Metalloproteinases 2 and 9, During Prostaglandin F2{alpha}-Induced Luteolysis in Sheep
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2002; 66(5): 1515 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Friedman, S. Weiss, N. Levy, and R. Meidan
Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} and Its Type I Receptor in Luteal Regression: Induction of Programmed Cell Death in Bovine Corpus Luteum-Derived Endothelial Cells
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2000; 63(6): 1905 - 1912.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. Levy, S.-i. Kobayashi, Z. Roth, D. Wolfenson, A. Miyamoto, and R. Meidan
Administration of Prostaglandin F2{alpha} During the Early Bovine Luteal Phase Does Not Alter the Expression of ET-1 and of Its Type A Receptor: A Possible Cause for Corpus Luteum Refractoriness
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2000; 63(2): 377 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. D. Niswender, J. L. Juengel, P. J. Silva, M. K. Rollyson, and E. W. McIntush
Mechanisms Controlling the Function and Life Span of the Corpus Luteum
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 1 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. J. Skarzynski and K. Okuda
Sensitivity of Bovine Corpora Lutea to Prostaglandin F2{alpha} Is Dependent on Progesterone, Oxytocin, and Prostaglandins
Biol Reprod, June 1, 1999; 60(6): 1292 - 1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
U. Salli, F.F. Bartol, A.A. Wiley, B.J. Tarleton, and T.D. Braden
Keratinocyte Growth Factor Expression by the Bovine Corpus Luteum
Biol Reprod, July 1, 1998; 59(1): 77 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Animal Science.