J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kauffman, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berg, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kauffman, R. G.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 7 1728-1736, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Electromagnetic scanning to predict lamb carcass composition

E. P. Berg, J. C. Forrest, D. L. Thomas, N. Nusbaum and R. G. Kauffman
Department of Animal Science, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907-1151.

The electromagnetic scanner generates a constant, low-level electromagnetic field (2.5 MHz) within a large plexiglass tube. The amount of electromagnetic (EM) energy transferred (to the carcass) is highly related to lean tissue. A plot of the absorption units over distance can be used to assess the total mass of lean tissue and of the respective primal cuts. The difference in curve height between two points (D), peak phase absorption, and linear carcass measurements (pre-rigor, HCWT or post-rigor, CWT carcass weight, and carcass length, LENG) were used to predict total dissected lean (TOTLEAN), dissected leg lean (LEGLEAN), and percentage of dissected carcass lean (PERLEAN). Twenty-one pre-rigor and 22 post-rigor (24 h chill) lamb carcasses, average weight 26.8 (+/- 4.2 kg) and 26.4 (+/- 4.1 kg) kg, respectively, were evaluated from measurements of total body electrical conductivity (TOBEC). Two geometric orientations were tested for statistical accuracy in this study: A) each carcass entered the EM tunnel rear leg first, on its left lateral side, neck facing the right side of the tunnel; and B) each carcass entered the EM tunnel rear leg first, breast down, and neck up. Orientation A proved more statistically efficient for pre-rigor carcasses, and orientation B was more desirable for post-rigor carcasses. Multiple-regression models involving HCWT, LENG, and a single D measure accounted for 98.0 and 95.0%, respectively, of the total variation in pre-rigor carcass TOTLEAN and LEGLEAN in A.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Animal Science.