J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tosh, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tosh, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, R. A.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 5 1184-1190, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Estimation of variance components for lamb weights in three sheep populations

J. J. Tosh and R. A. Kemp
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Variance components were estimated for lamb weight at birth, 50 d, and 100 d of age. Data from the Canadian flock recording program for lambs born in 1977 to 1991 for Hampshires (n = 6,395) and Polled Dorsets (n = 29,204) and 1982 to 1991 for Romanovs (n = 3,432) were studied. Observed weights were pre-adjusted for the effects of age of dam, sex of lamb, birth-rearing type, month or quarter of year of birth, parity-lambing interval, and age of dam at first lambing, using estimates derived from a fixed effects model including contemporary groups plus these factors. Pre-adjusting for nuisance variables reduced the number of equations in the model for variance component estimation. A single-trait animal model with derivative-free restricted maximum-likelihood procedures was used. Random effects were additive direct and maternal genetic, litter (common environmental), and error. An alternate model excluded maternal genetic effects. Estimates of litter variance as a proportion of phenotypic variance were of moderate size (.12 to .43) and consistent across breeds and models. The mean correlation between direct and maternal genetic effects, across traits and breeds, weighted by the number of animals, was -.40 (SE = .15). The maternal genetic variance or direct-maternal genetic covariance component, or both, was different from zero (P < .05) for all traits in Hampshires and Polled Dorsets, suggesting that maternal effects were important for weight of lambs even at 100 d of age. Estimates of direct heritability ranged from .05 to .45, varying across traits, breeds, and models.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
N. Maniatis and G. E. Pollott
The impact of data structure on genetic (co)variance components of early growth in sheep, estimated using an animal model with maternal effects
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 101 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. F. Wright, B. Sayre, E. Keith Inskeep, and J. A. Flores
Prostaglandin F2{alpha} Regulation of the Bovine Corpus Luteum Endothelin System During the Early and Midluteal Phase
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2001; 65(6): 1710 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Animal Science.