Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 5 1119-1125, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Prepartum body condition and weight influences on reproductive performance of first-calf beef cows

S. M. DeRouen, D. E. Franke, D. G. Morrison, W. E. Wyatt, D. F. Coombs, T. W. White, P. E. Humes and B. B. Greene
Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge 70803.

Data were collected on 476 spring-calving, primiparous cows at six locations in Louisiana over a 2-yr period. Objectives of the study were to evaluate changes in prepartum body condition score (BCS) and BW of heifers when fed varying energy levels and to determine the influences of prepartum BCS and BW changes and BCS at calving on postpartum traits. Heifers were allocated to one of three energy levels from approximately 90 d prepartum to parturition. The diets were formulated to provide low, recommended, and high energy levels based on TDN requirements. After calving, cows were placed on annual ryegrass pasture and managed similarly at each location. Weight and BCS at calving were greater (P < .05) for females with higher BCS at 90 d prepartum (IBCS) and for those assigned to higher energy levels. Calving and calf growth traits were not affected (P > .05) by IBCS, energy level, prepartum changes in BCS and BW, or BCS at calving. Prepartum changes in BCS and BW regulated by varying energy levels had no effect (P > .05) on postpartum reproduction; however, BCS at calving influenced (P < .03) pregnancy rate and days to pregnancy. Cows with BCS 6 and 7 at calving had higher (P < .05) pregnancy rates (87.0 and 90.7%) than those with BCS 4 and 5 (64.9 and 71.4%). Interval to pregnancy for cows with BCS 4 at calving was 10 to 18 d longer (P < .05) than for those with BCS > or = 5.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. C. Freetly, J. A. Nienaber, and T. Brown-Brandl Partitioning of energy in pregnant beef cows during nutritionally induced body weight fluctuation J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 370 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Flores, M. L. Looper, R. W. Rorie, M. A. Lamb, S. T. Reiter, D. M. Hallford, D. L. Kreider, and C. F. Rosenkrans Jr. Influence of body condition and bovine somatotropin on estrous behavior, reproductive performance, and concentrations of serum somatotropin and plasma fatty acids in postpartum Brahman-influenced cows J Anim Sci, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1318 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. L. Guerra, D. E. Franke, and D. C. Blouin Genetic parameters for calving rate and calf survival from linear, threshold, and logistic models in a multibreed beef cattle population J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3197 - 3203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Stalker, D. C. Adams, T. J. Klopfenstein, D. M. Feuz, and R. N. Funston Effects of pre- and postpartum nutrition on reproduction in spring calving cows and calf feedlot performance J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2582 - 2589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. C. Freetly, J. A. Nienaber, and T. Brown-Brandl Partitioning of energy during lactation of primiparous beef cows J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2157 - 2162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, R. L. Atkinson, V. Nayigihugu, S. I. Paisley, D. C. Rule, G. E. Moss, T. J. Robinson, and B. W. Hess Body condition score at parturition and postpartum supplemental fat effects on cow and calf performance J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2908 - 2917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. C. Freetly, C. L. Ferrell, and T. G. Jenkins Nutritionally altering weight gain patterns of pregnant heifers and young cows changes the time that feed resources are offered without any differences in production J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 916 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. H. Ciccioli, R. P. Wettemann, L. J. Spicer, C. A. Lents, F. J. White, and D. H. Keisler Influence of body condition at calving and postpartum nutrition on endocrine function and reproductive performance of primiparous beef cows J Anim Sci, December 1, 2003; 81(12): 3107 - 3120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]