J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhlers, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Little, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhlers, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Little, J. A.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 3 584-590, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

An experimental comparison of equivalent terminal and rotational crossbreeding systems in swine: sow and litter performance

D. L. Kuhlers, S. B. Jungst and J. A. Little
Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Auburn University, AL 36849-5415.

Two hundred sixty-two rotational and F1 sows were mated to Duroc, Yorkshire, or Landrace boars to study performance differences between equivalent three-breed rotational and three-breed terminal crossbreeding systems. Matings were made to maximize heterosis. The sows were fed either 1.8 or 2.7 kg/d (2.25 and 3.15 kg/d in winter months) during gestation. These matings produced 934 litters to determine the effect of crossbreeding system, breed composition within crossbreeding system, and gestation feeding level on litter sizes and weights, sow weight and backfat thickness at weaning, daily feed intake of the sow during lactation, interval from weaning to estrus, and farrowing rate. Feeding level during gestation was not an important source of variation for any of the traits except litter birth weight and daily feed intake of the sow during lactation. Litter size marketed was .37 pigs/litter greater (P < .05) for the terminal-cross sows than those sows from the rotational crossbreeding system. Litter weights at birth and 56 d were .8 and 6.5 kg heavier (P < .02, .03), respectively, for the terminal crossbreeding system than for the rotational crossbreeding system. Sow weight and backfat thickness at weaning, daily feed intake during lactation, and farrowing rate were not affected (P > .10) by crossbreeding system. Weaning-to-estrus interval was 1.3 d shorter (P < .03) for sows in the terminal crossbreeding system than for those in the rotational system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Animal Science.